Back to Search Start Over

Development and validation of a predictive model for American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status

Authors :
Seshadri C. Mudumbai
Suzann Pershing
Thomas Bowe
Robin N. Kamal
Erika D. Sears
Andrea K. Finlay
Dan Eisenberg
Mary T. Hawn
Yingjie Weng
Amber W. Trickey
Edward R. Mariano
Alex H. S. Harris
Source :
BMC Health Services Research, Vol 19, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2019)
Publication Year :
2019
Publisher :
BMC, 2019.

Abstract

Abstract Background The American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA-PS) classification system was developed to categorize the fitness of patients before surgery. Increasingly, the ASA-PS has been applied to other uses including justification of inpatient admission. Our objectives were to develop and cross-validate a statistical model for predicting ASA-PS; and 2) assess the concurrent and predictive validity of the model by assessing associations between model-derived ASA-PS, observed ASA-PS, and a diverse set of 30-day outcomes. Methods Using the 2014 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) Participant Use Data File, we developed and internally cross-validated multinomial regression models to predict ASA-PS using preoperative NSQIP data. Accuracy was assessed with C-Statistics and calibration plots. We assessed both concurrent and predictive validity of model-derived ASA-PS relative to observed ASA-PS and 30-day outcomes. To aid further research and use of the ASA-PS model, we implemented it into an online calculator. Results Of the 566,797 elective procedures in the final analytic dataset, 8.9% were ASA-PS 1, 48.9% were ASA-PS 2, 39.1% were ASA-PS 3, and 3.2% were ASA-PS 4. The accuracy of the 21-variable model to predict ASA-PS was C = 0.77 +/− 0.0025. The model-derived ASA-PS had stronger association with key indicators of preoperative status including comorbidities and higher BMI (concurrent validity) compared to observed ASA-PS, but less strong associations with postoperative complications (predictive validity). The online ASA-PS calculator may be accessed at https://s-spire-clintools.shinyapps.io/ASA_PS_Estimator/ Conclusions Model-derived ASA-PS better tracked key indicators of preoperative status compared to observed ASA-PS. The ability to have an electronically derived measure of ASA-PS can potentially be useful in research, quality measurement, and clinical applications.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
14726963
Volume :
19
Issue :
1
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
BMC Health Services Research
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.9d3d9661cdc4481499a15b7af00808fb
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4640-x