Back to Search Start Over

Differences in learning strategies, goal orientations, and self-concept between overachieving, normal-achieving, and underachieving secondary students.

Authors :
JUAN LUIS CASTEJON
Raquel Gilar
Alejandro Veas
PABLO MIÑANO
Source :
Frontiers in Psychology, Vol 7 (2016)
Publication Year :
2016
Publisher :
Frontiers Media S.A., 2016.

Abstract

The aims of this work were to identify and establish differential characteristics in learning strategies, goal orientations and self-concept between overachieving, normal-achieving and underachieving secondary students. A total of 1,400 Spanish first and second year high school students from the South-East geographical area participated in this study. Three groups of students were established: a group with underachieving students, a group with a normal level of achievement, and a third group with overachieving students. The students were assigned to each group depending on the residual punctuations obtained from a multiple regression analysis in which the punctuation of an IQ test was the predictor and a measure composed of the school grades of nine subjects was the criteria. The results of one-way ANOVA and the Games-Howell post-hoc test showed that underachieving students had significantly lower punctuations in all of the measures of learning strategies and learning goals, as well as all of the academic self-concept, personal self-concept, parental relationship, honesty, and personal stability factors. In contrast, overachieving students had higher punctuations than underachieving students in the same variables and higher punctuations than normal-achieving students in most of the variables in which significant differences were detected. These results have clear educational implications.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
16641078
Volume :
7
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Frontiers in Psychology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.9d8b573cf094a9eb487228db65815d6
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01438