Back to Search Start Over

Genotype-specific effects of elamipretide in patients with primary mitochondrial myopathy: a post hoc analysis of the MMPOWER-3 trial

Authors :
Amel Karaa
Enrico Bertini
Valerio Carelli
Bruce Cohen
Gregory M. Ennes
Marni J. Falk
Amy Goldstein
Gráinne Gorman
Richard Haas
Michio Hirano
Thomas Klopstock
Mary Kay Koenig
Cornelia Kornblum
Costanza Lamperti
Anna Lehman
Nicola Longo
Maria Judit Molnar
Sumit Parikh
Han Phan
Robert D. S. Pitceathly
Russekk Saneto
Fernando Scaglia
Serenella Servidei
Mark Tarnopolsky
Antonio Toscano
Johan L. K. Van Hove
John Vissing
Jerry Vockley
Jeffrey S. Finman
Anthony Abbruscato
David A. Brown
Alana Sullivan
James A. Shiffer
Michelango Mancuso
on behalf of the MMPOWER-3 Trial Investigators
Source :
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, Vol 19, Iss 1, Pp 1-12 (2024)
Publication Year :
2024
Publisher :
BMC, 2024.

Abstract

Abstract Background As previously published, the MMPOWER-3 clinical trial did not demonstrate a significant benefit of elamipretide treatment in a genotypically diverse population of adults with primary mitochondrial myopathy (PMM). However, the prespecified subgroup of subjects with disease-causing nuclear DNA (nDNA) pathogenic variants receiving elamipretide experienced an improvement in the six-minute walk test (6MWT), while the cohort of subjects with mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) pathogenic variants showed no difference versus placebo. These published findings prompted additional genotype-specific post hoc analyses of the MMPOWER-3 trial. Here, we present these analyses to further investigate the findings and to seek trends and commonalities among those subjects who responded to treatment, to build a more precise Phase 3 trial design for further investigation in likely responders. Results Subjects with mtDNA pathogenic variants or single large-scale mtDNA deletions represented 74% of the MMPOWER-3 population, with 70% in the mtDNA cohort having either single large-scale mtDNA deletions or MT-TL1 pathogenic variants. Most subjects in the nDNA cohort had pathogenic variants in genes required for mtDNA maintenance (mtDNA replisome), the majority of which were in POLG and TWNK. The mtDNA replisome post-hoc cohort displayed an improvement on the 6MWT, trending towards significant, in the elamipretide group when compared with placebo (25.2 ± 8.7 m versus 2.0 ± 8.6 m for placebo group; p = 0.06). The 6MWT results at week 24 in subjects with replisome variants showed a significant change in the elamipretide group subjects who had chronic progressive external ophthalmoplegia (CPEO) (37.3 ± 9.5 m versus − 8.0 ± 10.7 m for the placebo group; p = 0.0024). Pharmacokinetic (exposure–response) analyses in the nDNA cohort showed a weak positive correlation between plasma elamipretide concentration and 6MWT improvement. Conclusions Post hoc analyses indicated that elamipretide had a beneficial effect in PMM patients with mtDNA replisome disorders, underscoring the importance of considering specific genetic subtypes in PMM clinical trials. These data serve as the foundation for a follow-up Phase 3 clinical trial (NuPOWER) which has been designed as described in this paper to determine the efficacy of elamipretide in patients with mtDNA maintenance-related disorders. Classification of evidence Class I ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03323749

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
17501172
Volume :
19
Issue :
1
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.9ee65de424ba47d7a85aadc248d7ce12
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-024-03421-5