Back to Search Start Over

Identification and Antagonistic Potential of Bacillus atrophaeus against Wheat Crown Rot Caused by Fusarium pseudograminearum

Authors :
Shengzhi Guo
Arneeb Tariq
Jun Liao
Aowei Yang
Xinyan Jiang
Yanling Yin
Yuan Shi
Changfu Li
Junfeng Pan
Dejun Han
Xihui Shen
Source :
Agronomy, Vol 14, Iss 9, p 2135 (2024)
Publication Year :
2024
Publisher :
MDPI AG, 2024.

Abstract

Fusarium pseudograminearum (Fpg) is a significant pathogen responsible for fusarium crown rot (FCR) in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), a disease with devastating impacts on crop yield. The utilization of biocontrol bacteria to combat fungal diseases in plants is a cost-effective, eco-friendly, and sustainable strategy. In this trial, an endophytic bacterial species, designated as SW, was isolated from the roots of wheat. The strain exhibited potent antagonistic effects against Fpg and reduced the FCR disease severity index by 76.07 ± 0.33% in a greenhouse pot trial. Here, 106 colony-forming units (CFUs)/mL of the SW strain was determined to be the minimum dose required to exhibit the antagonism against Fpg. The strain was identified as Bacillus atrophaeus using genome sequencing and comparison with type strains in the NCBI database. Whole-genome sequencing analysis revealed that SW harbors genes for siderophores, antifungal metabolites, and antibiotics, which are key contributors to its antagonistic activity. Additionally, the strain’s ability to utilize various carbon and nitrogen sources, successfully colonize wheat root tissues as an endophyte, and form biofilms are critical attributes for promoting plant growth. In summary, these findings demonstrate the ability of Bacillus atrophaeus to control FCR disease in wheat in a sustainable agricultural setting.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20734395
Volume :
14
Issue :
9
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Agronomy
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.9ee92a3cf6e4ac78f9d3a4820e2b135
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14092135