Back to Search Start Over

A crowdsourced set of curated structural variants for the human genome.

Authors :
Lesley M Chapman
Noah Spies
Patrick Pai
Chun Shen Lim
Andrew Carroll
Giuseppe Narzisi
Christopher M Watson
Christos Proukakis
Wayne E Clarke
Naoki Nariai
Eric Dawson
Garan Jones
Daniel Blankenberg
Christian Brueffer
Chunlin Xiao
Sree Rohit Raj Kolora
Noah Alexander
Paul Wolujewicz
Azza E Ahmed
Graeme Smith
Saadlee Shehreen
Aaron M Wenger
Marc Salit
Justin M Zook
Source :
PLoS Computational Biology, Vol 16, Iss 6, p e1007933 (2020)
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Public Library of Science (PLoS), 2020.

Abstract

A high quality benchmark for small variants encompassing 88 to 90% of the reference genome has been developed for seven Genome in a Bottle (GIAB) reference samples. However a reliable benchmark for large indels and structural variants (SVs) is more challenging. In this study, we manually curated 1235 SVs, which can ultimately be used to evaluate SV callers or train machine learning models. We developed a crowdsourcing app-SVCurator-to help GIAB curators manually review large indels and SVs within the human genome, and report their genotype and size accuracy. SVCurator displays images from short, long, and linked read sequencing data from the GIAB Ashkenazi Jewish Trio son [NIST RM 8391/HG002]. We asked curators to assign labels describing SV type (deletion or insertion), size accuracy, and genotype for 1235 putative insertions and deletions sampled from different size bins between 20 and 892,149 bp. 'Expert' curators were 93% concordant with each other, and 37 of the 61 curators had at least 78% concordance with a set of 'expert' curators. The curators were least concordant for complex SVs and SVs that had inaccurate breakpoints or size predictions. After filtering events with low concordance among curators, we produced high confidence labels for 935 events. The SVCurator crowdsourced labels were 94.5% concordant with the heuristic-based draft benchmark SV callset from GIAB. We found that curators can successfully evaluate putative SVs when given evidence from multiple sequencing technologies.

Subjects

Subjects :
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1553734X and 15537358
Volume :
16
Issue :
6
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
PLoS Computational Biology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.b08f9ccca37e4727afc897d6fa521024
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007933