Back to Search Start Over

How does per-oral endoscopic myotomy compare to Heller myotomy? The Latin American perspective

Authors :
Michel Kahaleh
Amy Tyberg
Supriya Suresh
Arnon Lambroza
Monica Gaidhane
Felipe Zamarripa
Guadalupe Ma Martínez
Juan C. Carames
Eduardo T. Moura
Galileu F. Farias
Maria G. Porfilio
Jose Nieto
Mario Rey
Fernando Rodriguez Casas
Oscar V. Mondragón Hernández
Romulo Vargas-Rubio
Raul Canadas
Albis Hani
Guillermo Munoz
Bismarck Castillo
Hannah P. Lukashok
Carlos Robles-Medranda
Eduardo G de Moura
Source :
Endoscopy International Open, Vol 08, Iss 10, Pp E1392-E1397 (2020)
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Georg Thieme Verlag KG, 2020.

Abstract

Background and study aims Both Heller myotomy (HM) and per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) are efficacious therapies for achalasia. The efficacy and safety of POEM vs HM in Latin America and specifically in patients with Chagas disease is unknown. Patients and methods Consecutive patients undergoing either HM or POEM for achalasia were included from nine Latin American centers in a prospective registry over 5 years. Technical success was defined as undergoing a successful myotomy. Clinical success was defined as achieving an Eckardt score

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
23643722 and 21969736
Volume :
08
Issue :
10
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Endoscopy International Open
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.b1c00c7d797947ce83d108aa6ac81d8f
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1223-1521