Back to Search Start Over

Comparative Study of Gasless Transaxillary, Bilateral Axillo-Breast, Unilateral Axillo-Breast With Carbon Dioxide Insufflation, Retroauricular, and Transoral Vestibular Endoscopic Thyroidectomy Approaches at a Single Institution: A Retrospective Analysis and Lessons Learned

Authors :
Myung-Chul Lee
Jungmin Ahn
Ik Joon Choi
Byeong-Cheol Lee
Junsun Ryu
Source :
Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology, Vol 15, Iss 3, Pp 283-291 (2022)
Publication Year :
2022
Publisher :
Korean Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 2022.

Abstract

Objectives This study aimed to present our experiences with various approaches for endoscopic thyroidectomy (ET) and to offer lessons for choosing an approach. Methods The medical records of 701 patients who underwent ET via the transaxillary (TA), bilateral axillo-breast (BABA), unilateral axillo-breast with carbon dioxide insufflation (UABA), retroauricular (RA), or transoral vestibular (TO) approach between May 2008 and March 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Postoperative pain and cosmetic outcomes were evaluated using visual analog scales. Results The mean operative time of UABA was the shortest among the five approaches (TA, 194.65±51.13 minutes; BABA, 189.11±61.53 minutes; UABA, 118.62±30.23 minutes; RA, 168.22±45.63 minutes; TO, 196.10±40.19 minutes; P=0.02). BABA was the most painful approach, while TO was the least painful on postoperative day 1 (TA, 3.09±0.96; BABA, 3.59±0.92; UABA, 2.39±0.54; RA, 3.49±0.93; TO, 2.01±0.37; P=0.04) and day 3 (TA, 2.10±0.77; BABA, 2.59±0.88; UABA, 1.84±0.37; RA, 3.01±0.67; TO, 1.49±0.45; P=0.04). The TO group had the best cosmetic outcomes at 3 months (TA, 3.91±1.21; BABA, 4.52±1.13; UABA, 4.49±0.74; RA, 4.28±0.74; TO, 4.81±0.48; P=0.04). Conclusion We present a single-surgeon experience of five distinctive ET approaches and the lessons from each approach, together with a literature review. This data may aid endoscopic thyroid surgeons in choosing from various ET approaches.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
19768710 and 20050720
Volume :
15
Issue :
3
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.b31cbcb58094b70a85ed7f33c8df797
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.21053/ceo.2021.02285