Back to Search Start Over

Job strain and alcohol intake: a collaborative meta-analysis of individual-participant data from 140,000 men and women.

Authors :
Katriina Heikkilä
Solja T Nyberg
Eleonor I Fransson
Lars Alfredsson
Dirk De Bacquer
Jakob B Bjorner
Sébastien Bonenfant
Marianne Borritz
Hermann Burr
Els Clays
Annalisa Casini
Nico Dragano
Raimund Erbel
Goedele A Geuskens
Marcel Goldberg
Wendela E Hooftman
Irene L Houtman
Matti Joensuu
Karl-Heinz Jöckel
France Kittel
Anders Knutsson
Markku Koskenvuo
Aki Koskinen
Anne Kouvonen
Constanze Leineweber
Thorsten Lunau
Ida E H Madsen
Linda L Magnusson Hanson
Michael G Marmot
Martin L Nielsen
Maria Nordin
Jaana Pentti
Paula Salo
Reiner Rugulies
Andrew Steptoe
Johannes Siegrist
Sakari Suominen
Jussi Vahtera
Marianna Virtanen
Ari Väänänen
Peter Westerholm
Hugo Westerlund
Marie Zins
Töres Theorell
Mark Hamer
Jane E Ferrie
Archana Singh-Manoux
G David Batty
Mika Kivimäki
IPD-Work Consortium
Source :
PLoS ONE, Vol 7, Iss 7, p e40101 (2012)
Publication Year :
2012
Publisher :
Public Library of Science (PLoS), 2012.

Abstract

The relationship between work-related stress and alcohol intake is uncertain. In order to add to the thus far inconsistent evidence from relatively small studies, we conducted individual-participant meta-analyses of the association between work-related stress (operationalised as self-reported job strain) and alcohol intake.We analysed cross-sectional data from 12 European studies (n = 142 140) and longitudinal data from four studies (n = 48 646). Job strain and alcohol intake were self-reported. Job strain was analysed as a binary variable (strain vs. no strain). Alcohol intake was harmonised into the following categories: none, moderate (women: 1-14, men: 1-21 drinks/week), intermediate (women: 15-20, men: 22-27 drinks/week) and heavy (women: >20, men: >27 drinks/week). Cross-sectional associations were modelled using logistic regression and the results pooled in random effects meta-analyses. Longitudinal associations were examined using mixed effects logistic and modified Poisson regression. Compared to moderate drinkers, non-drinkers and (random effects odds ratio (OR): 1.10, 95% CI: 1.05, 1.14) and heavy drinkers (OR: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.00, 1.26) had higher odds of job strain. Intermediate drinkers, on the other hand, had lower odds of job strain (OR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.86, 0.99). We found no clear evidence for longitudinal associations between job strain and alcohol intake.Our findings suggest that compared to moderate drinkers, non-drinkers and heavy drinkers are more likely and intermediate drinkers less likely to report work-related stress.

Subjects

Subjects :
Medicine
Science

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
19326203
Volume :
7
Issue :
7
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
PLoS ONE
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.b33f716689fa4018b3751315ed49ee88
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0040101