Back to Search Start Over

A myriad of methods to determine temporal summation of pain in people with musculoskeletal pain and healthy participants: a scoping review

Authors :
Sjoerd C. Kielstra
Roland R. Reezigt
Michel W. Coppieters
Ralph de Vries
Lars Arendt-Nielsen
Kristian K. Petersen
David Yarnitsky
Gwendolyne G.M. Scholten-Peeters
Source :
PAIN Reports, Vol 9, Iss 5, p e1176 (2024)
Publication Year :
2024
Publisher :
Wolters Kluwer, 2024.

Abstract

Abstract. Temporal summation of pain (TSP) is a human proxy for wind-up of dorsal horn neurons as assessed in animals. The common paradigm for eliciting TSP is evoked by repetitive nociceptive stimuli of equal intensity. Various stimulation and assessment protocols have been used. This scoping review aims to provide insight into key elements of TSP stimulation and assessment: modality, instruments, test location, familiarization, train characteristics, and calculations. PubMed, Embase, and Ebsco/CINAHL were searched for studies that measured TSP in adults with musculoskeletal conditions and healthy people. Four hundred six studies were included. Mechanical stimuli were the most commonly used modality (250 studies), followed by thermal stimuli (125 studies). Forty-six different instruments were used. Disregarding studies on widespread musculoskeletal pain and healthy participants, 40 studies evaluated TSP at painful sites, 77 in remote areas, and 66 in both locations. Of the 13 tested locations in patients, the hand (74 studies), lower leg (64 studies), and forearm (59 studies) were most commonly tested. A single practice round was the most common familiarization method (46 studies). Repeated stimuli were applied using 31 different frequencies (0.03-200 Hz) and sustained stimulations ranging from 5 to 1080 seconds were used. Twenty-two different train lengths, 63 different calculations (37 absolute, 19 relative, and 7 alternatives using data directly), and 14 different outcome measures (eg, self-reported pain rating scales and reflex thresholds) were used. Temporal summation of pain protocols vary excessively, hindering the comparison and pooling of results. None of the studies provided substantiation for their protocol choice.

Subjects

Subjects :
Anesthesiology
RD78.3-87.3

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
24712531 and 00000000
Volume :
9
Issue :
5
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
PAIN Reports
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.b6915ead49c648af8465dc713f9a8ce6
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1097/PR9.0000000000001176