Back to Search Start Over

Causal relationship between obesity and vitamin D status: bi-directional Mendelian randomization analysis of multiple cohorts.

Authors :
Karani S Vimaleswaran
Diane J Berry
Chen Lu
Emmi Tikkanen
Stefan Pilz
Linda T Hiraki
Jason D Cooper
Zari Dastani
Rui Li
Denise K Houston
Andrew R Wood
Karl Michaëlsson
Liesbeth Vandenput
Lina Zgaga
Laura M Yerges-Armstrong
Mark I McCarthy
Josée Dupuis
Marika Kaakinen
Marcus E Kleber
Karen Jameson
Nigel Arden
Olli Raitakari
Jorma Viikari
Kurt K Lohman
Luigi Ferrucci
Håkan Melhus
Erik Ingelsson
Liisa Byberg
Lars Lind
Mattias Lorentzon
Veikko Salomaa
Harry Campbell
Malcolm Dunlop
Braxton D Mitchell
Karl-Heinz Herzig
Anneli Pouta
Anna-Liisa Hartikainen
Genetic Investigation of Anthropometric Traits-GIANT Consortium
Elizabeth A Streeten
Evropi Theodoratou
Antti Jula
Nicholas J Wareham
Claes Ohlsson
Timothy M Frayling
Stephen B Kritchevsky
Timothy D Spector
J Brent Richards
Terho Lehtimäki
Willem H Ouwehand
Peter Kraft
Cyrus Cooper
Winfried März
Chris Power
Ruth J F Loos
Thomas J Wang
Marjo-Riitta Järvelin
John C Whittaker
Aroon D Hingorani
Elina Hyppönen
Source :
PLoS Medicine, Vol 10, Iss 2, p e1001383 (2013)
Publication Year :
2013
Publisher :
Public Library of Science (PLoS), 2013.

Abstract

BackgroundObesity is associated with vitamin D deficiency, and both are areas of active public health concern. We explored the causality and direction of the relationship between body mass index (BMI) and 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] using genetic markers as instrumental variables (IVs) in bi-directional Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis.Methods and findingsWe used information from 21 adult cohorts (up to 42,024 participants) with 12 BMI-related SNPs (combined in an allelic score) to produce an instrument for BMI and four SNPs associated with 25(OH)D (combined in two allelic scores, separately for genes encoding its synthesis or metabolism) as an instrument for vitamin D. Regression estimates for the IVs (allele scores) were generated within-study and pooled by meta-analysis to generate summary effects. Associations between vitamin D scores and BMI were confirmed in the Genetic Investigation of Anthropometric Traits (GIANT) consortium (n = 123,864). Each 1 kg/m(2) higher BMI was associated with 1.15% lower 25(OH)D (p = 6.52×10⁻²⁷). The BMI allele score was associated both with BMI (p = 6.30×10⁻⁶²) and 25(OH)D (-0.06% [95% CI -0.10 to -0.02], p = 0.004) in the cohorts that underwent meta-analysis. The two vitamin D allele scores were strongly associated with 25(OH)D (p≤8.07×10⁻⁵⁷ for both scores) but not with BMI (synthesis score, p = 0.88; metabolism score, p = 0.08) in the meta-analysis. A 10% higher genetically instrumented BMI was associated with 4.2% lower 25(OH)D concentrations (IV ratio: -4.2 [95% CI -7.1 to -1.3], p = 0.005). No association was seen for genetically instrumented 25(OH)D with BMI, a finding that was confirmed using data from the GIANT consortium (p≥0.57 for both vitamin D scores).ConclusionsOn the basis of a bi-directional genetic approach that limits confounding, our study suggests that a higher BMI leads to lower 25(OH)D, while any effects of lower 25(OH)D increasing BMI are likely to be small. Population level interventions to reduce BMI are expected to decrease the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency.

Subjects

Subjects :
Medicine

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
15491277 and 15491676
Volume :
10
Issue :
2
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
PLoS Medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.b73c0ace41a34f9a9e7c739cdcd2f5a9
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001383