Back to Search Start Over

Efficacy and safety of a proposed omalizumab biosimilar compared to the reference product in the management of uncontrolled moderate-to-severe allergic asthma: a multicenter, phase III, randomized, double-blind, equivalency clinical trial

Authors :
Mostafa Ghanei
Babak Ghalebaghi
Ramin Sami
Mehdi Torabizadeh
Majid Mirsadraee
Babak Amra
Marzieh Tavakol
Hanieh Raji
Morteza Fallahpour
Arda Kiani
Atefeh Abedini
Farahzad Jabbari Azad
Seyed Alireza Mahdaviani
Davood Attaran
Mohammad Samet
Sasan Tavana
Maryam Haddadzadeh shoushtari
Javad Nazari
FatemehAlsadat AghaeiMeybodi
Mohammad Reza Fazlollahi
Ramin Ghasemi
Araz Sabzvari
Hamidreza Kafi
Esmaeil Idani
Source :
Frontiers in Immunology, Vol 15 (2024)
Publication Year :
2024
Publisher :
Frontiers Media S.A., 2024.

Abstract

Background and aimsAllergic asthma has a considerable burden on the quality of life. A significant portion of moderate-to-severe allergic asthma patients need omalizumab, an anti-immunoglobulin-E monoclonal antibody, as an add-on therapy. In this phase III clinical trial P043 (Zerafil®, CinnaGen, Iran) efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity were compared with Xolair® (the originator omalizumab). The primary outcome was the rate of protocol-defined asthma exacerbations.MethodsExacerbation rates, Asthma Control Test (ACT) results, spirometry measurements, immunogenicity, and safety were evaluated. Each subject received either medication with a dose ranging from 150 to 375 mg based on pre-treatment serum total IgE level (IU/mL) and body weight (kg) every two or four weeks for a duration of 28 weeks.ResultsExacerbation rates were 0.150 (CI: 0.079-0.220) in the P043 group, and 0.190 (CI: 0.110-0.270) in the omalizumab group (per-protocol). The least squares mean differences of predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in the First second (FEV1) were -2.51% (CI: -7.17-2.15, P=0.29) and -3.87% (CI: -8.79-1.04, P=0.12), pre- and post-bronchodilator use. The mean ± SD of ACT scores at the screening and the last visit were 10.62 ± 2.93 and 20.93 ± 4.26 in P043 and 11.09 ± 2.75 and 20.46 ± 5.11 in the omalizumab group. A total of 288 adverse events were reported for the 256 enrolled participants. Among all, “dyspnea” and “headache” were the most reported ones. The overall incidence of adverse events (P=0.62) and serious adverse events (P=0.07) had no significant differences between the two groups. None of the samples were positive for anti-drug antibodies.ConclusionP043 was equivalent to omalizumab in the management of asthma in reduction of exacerbations. There was no significant difference in other efficacy and safety parameters.Clinical trial registrationwww.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05813470) and www.IRCT.ir (IRCT20150303021315N20).

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
16643224
Volume :
15
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Frontiers in Immunology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.b98cbaefa1a74151ac409a3c55b22108
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2024.1425906