Back to Search Start Over

Clinical outcomes of permanent stenting with endoscopic ultrasound gallbladder drainage

Authors :
Eisuke Suzuki
Yuji Fujita
Kunihiro Hosono
Yuji Koyama
Seitaro Tsujino
Takuma Teratani
Atsushi Nakajima
Nobuyuki Matsuhashi
Source :
Clinical Endoscopy, Vol 56, Iss 5, Pp 650-657 (2023)
Publication Year :
2023
Publisher :
Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2023.

Abstract

Background/Aims Endoscopic ultrasound gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) is gaining attention as a treatment method for cholecystitis. However, only a few studies have assessed the outcomes of permanent stenting with EUS-GBD. Therefore, we evaluated the clinical outcomes of permanent stenting using EUS-GBD. Methods This was a retrospective, single-center cohort study. The criteria for EUS-GBD at our institution are a high risk for surgery, inability to perform surgery owing to poor performance status, and inability to obtain consent for emergency surgery. EUS-GBD was performed using a 7-Fr double-pigtail plastic stent with a dilating device. The primary outcomes were the recurrence-free rate of cholecystitis and the late-stage complication-avoidance rate. Secondary outcomes were technical success, clinical success, and procedural adverse events. Results A total of 41 patients were included in the analysis. The median follow-up period was 168 (range, 10–1,238) days. The recurrence-free and late-stage complication-avoidance rates during the follow-up period were 95% (38 cases) and 90% (36 cases), respectively. There were only two cases of cholecystitis recurrence during the study period. Conclusions EUS-GBD using double-pigtail plastic stent was safe and effective with few complications, even in the long term, in patients with acute cholecystitis.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
22342400 and 22342443
Volume :
56
Issue :
5
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Clinical Endoscopy
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.bb0644907d0344b79b33cd740fbc90e3
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2022.190