Back to Search Start Over

Real-world Implications of Botulinum Neurotoxin A Immunoresistance for Consumers and Aesthetic Practitioners: Insights from ASCEND Multidisciplinary Panel

Authors :
Niamh Corduff, MBBS, FRACS
Je-Young Park, MD
Pacifico E. Calderon, MD, MBEth, MEd
Hosung Choi, MD
Mary Dingley, MBBS, FACCSM, FCPCA
Wilson W. S. Ho, MBChB, FRCSEd
Michael U. Martin, PhD
Lis S. Suseno, MD
Fang-Wen Tseng, MD
Vasanop Vachiramon, MD
Rungsima Wanitphakdeedecha, MD, MA, MSc
Jonathan N. T. Yu, MD
Source :
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open, Vol 12, Iss 6, p e5892 (2024)
Publication Year :
2024
Publisher :
Wolters Kluwer, 2024.

Abstract

Background:. As long-term, regular aesthetic botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT-A) use becomes more commonplace, it is vital to understand real-world risk factors and impact of BoNT-A immunoresistance. The first Aesthetic Council on Ethical Use of Neurotoxin Delivery panel discussed issues relating to BoNT-A immunoresistance from the health care professionals’ (HCPs’) perspective. Understanding the implications of BoNT-A immunoresistance from the aesthetic patient’s viewpoint allows HCPs to better support patients throughout their aesthetic treatment journey. Methods:. A real-world consumer study surveyed 363 experienced aesthetic BoNT-A recipients across six Asia-Pacific territories. The survey mapped participants’ BoNT-A aesthetic treatment journey and characterized awareness and attitudes relating to BoNT-A immunoresistance and treatment implications. At the second Aesthetic Council on Ethical use of Neurotoxin Delivery meeting, panelists discussed survey findings and developed consensus statements relating to the impact of BoNT-A immunoresistance on the aesthetic treatment journey. Results:. Aesthetic BoNT-A patients’ depth of knowledge about BoNT-A immunoresistance remains low, and risk/benefit communications need to be more lay-friendly. The initial consultation is the most important touchpoint for HCPs to raise awareness of BoNT-A immunoresistance as a potential side effect considering increased risk with repeated high-dose treatments. HCPs should be cognizant of differences across BoNT-A formulations due to the presence of certain excipients and pharmacologically unnecessary components that can increase immunogenicity. Standardized screening for clinical signs of secondary nonresponse and a framework for diagnosing and managing immunoresistance-related secondary nonresponse were proposed. Conclusion:. These insights can help patients and HCPs make informed treatment decisions to achieve desired aesthetic outcomes while preserving future treatment options with BoNT-A.

Subjects

Subjects :
Surgery
RD1-811

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
21697574 and 00000000
Volume :
12
Issue :
6
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.be2c0341340d465c9548fd917449176c
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000005892