Back to Search Start Over

Preanalytical Pitfalls in Untargeted Plasma Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Metabolomics of Endocrine Hypertension

Authors :
Nikolaos G. Bliziotis
Leo A. J. Kluijtmans
Gerjen H. Tinnevelt
Parminder Reel
Smarti Reel
Katharina Langton
Mercedes Robledo
Christina Pamporaki
Alessio Pecori
Josie Van Kralingen
Martina Tetti
Udo F. H. Engelke
Zoran Erlic
Jasper Engel
Timo Deutschbein
Svenja Nölting
Aleksander Prejbisz
Susan Richter
Jerzy Adamski
Andrzej Januszewicz
Filippo Ceccato
Carla Scaroni
Michael C. Dennedy
Tracy A. Williams
Livia Lenzini
Anne-Paule Gimenez-Roqueplo
Eleanor Davies
Martin Fassnacht
Hanna Remde
Graeme Eisenhofer
Felix Beuschlein
Matthias Kroiss
Emily Jefferson
Maria-Christina Zennaro
Ron A. Wevers
Jeroen J. Jansen
Jaap Deinum
Henri J. L. M. Timmers
Source :
Metabolites, Vol 12, Iss 8, p 679 (2022)
Publication Year :
2022
Publisher :
MDPI AG, 2022.

Abstract

Despite considerable morbidity and mortality, numerous cases of endocrine hypertension (EHT) forms, including primary aldosteronism (PA), pheochromocytoma and functional paraganglioma (PPGL), and Cushing’s syndrome (CS), remain undetected. We aimed to establish signatures for the different forms of EHT, investigate potentially confounding effects and establish unbiased disease biomarkers. Plasma samples were obtained from 13 biobanks across seven countries and analyzed using untargeted NMR metabolomics. We compared unstratified samples of 106 PHT patients to 231 EHT patients, including 104 PA, 94 PPGL and 33 CS patients. Spectra were subjected to a multivariate statistical comparison of PHT to EHT forms and the associated signatures were obtained. Three approaches were applied to investigate and correct confounding effects. Though we found signatures that could separate PHT from EHT forms, there were also key similarities with the signatures of sample center of origin and sample age. The study design restricted the applicability of the corrections employed. With the samples that were available, no biomarkers for PHT vs. EHT could be identified. The complexity of the confounding effects, evidenced by their robustness to correction approaches, highlighted the need for a consensus on how to deal with variabilities probably attributed to preanalytical factors in retrospective, multicenter metabolomics studies.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
22181989
Volume :
12
Issue :
8
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Metabolites
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.bff7db4cbcd43ff877f5cefe5971e51
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo12080679