Back to Search Start Over

Passive Fetal Monitoring by Advanced Signal Processing Methods in Fetal Phonocardiography

Authors :
Radek Martinek
Katerina Barnova
Rene Jaros
Radana Kahankova
Tomasz Kupka
Michal Jezewski
Robert Czabanski
Adam Matonia
Janusz Jezewski
Krzysztof Horoba
Source :
IEEE Access, Vol 8, Pp 221942-221962 (2020)
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
IEEE, 2020.

Abstract

Fetal phonocardiography (fPCG) is a non-invasive technique for detection of fetal heart sounds (fHSs), murmurs and vibrations. This acoustic recording is passive and provides an alternative low-cost method to ultrasonographic cardiotocography (CTG). Unfortunately, the fPCG signal is often disturbed by the wide range of artifacts that make it difficult to obtain significant diagnostic information from this signal. The study focuses on the filtering of an fPCG signal containing three types of noise (ambient noise, Gaussian noise, and movement artifacts of the mother and the fetus) having different amplitudes. Three advanced signal processing methods: empirical mode decomposition (EMD), ensemble empirical mode decomposition (EEMD), and adaptive wavelet transform (AWT) were tested and compared. The evaluation of the extraction was performed by determining the accuracy of S1 sounds detection and by determining the fetal heart rate (fHR). The evaluation of the effectiveness of the method was performed using signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), mean error of heart interval measurement (|ΔTi| ), and the statistical parameters of accuracy (ACC), sensitivity (SE), positive predictive value (PPV), and harmonic mean between SE and PPV (F1). Using the EMD method, ACC > 95$ % was achieved in 7 out of 12 types and levels of interference with average values of ACC = 88.73 %, SE = 91.57 %, PPV = 94.80 % and $\text {F1} = 93.12$ %. Using the EEMD method, ACC > 95$ % was achieved in 9 out of 12 types and levels of interference with average values of ACC = 97.49 %, SE = 97.89 %, PV = 99.53 % and F1 = 98.69 %. In this study, the best results were achieved using the AWT method, which provided ACC > 95 % in all 12 types and levels of interference with average values of ACC = 99.34 %, SE = 99.49 %, PPV = 99.85 % a F1 = 99.67 %.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
21693536
Volume :
8
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
IEEE Access
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.f1b9727455644119a52816a73dfc1f4b
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3043496