Back to Search Start Over

Overestimation of school-based deworming coverage resulting from school-based reporting.

Authors :
William Sheahan
Roy Anderson
Kumudha Aruldas
Euripide Avokpaho
Sean Galagan
Jeanne Goodman
Parfait Houngbegnon
Gideon John Israel
Venkateshprabhu Janagaraj
Saravanakumar Puthupalayam Kaliappan
Arianna Rubin Means
Chloe Morozoff
Emily Pearman
Rohan Michael Ramesh
Amy Roll
Alexandra Schaefer
James Simwanza
Stefan Witek-McManus
Sitara S R Ajjampur
Robin Bailey
Moudachirou Ibikounlé
Khumbo Kalua
Adrian J F Luty
Rachel Pullan
Judd L Walson
Kristjana Hrönn Ásbjörnsdóttir
Source :
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Vol 17, Iss 4, p e0010401 (2023)
Publication Year :
2023
Publisher :
Public Library of Science (PLoS), 2023.

Abstract

BackgroundSoil Transmitted Helminths (STH) infect over 1.5 billion people globally and are associated with anemia and stunting, resulting in an annual toll of 1.9 million Disability-Adjusted Life Years (DALYs). School-based deworming (SBD), via mass drug administration (MDA) campaigns with albendazole or mebendazole, has been recommended by the World Health Organization to reduce levels of morbidity due to STH in endemic areas. DeWorm3 is a cluster-randomized trial, conducted in three study sites in Benin, India, and Malawi, designed to assess the feasibility of interrupting STH transmission with community-wide MDA as a potential strategy to replace SBD. This analysis examines data from the DeWorm3 trial to quantify discrepancies between school-level reporting of SBD and gold standard individual-level survey reporting of SBD.Methodology/principal findingsPopulation-weighted averages of school-level SBD calculated at the cluster level were compared to aggregated individual-level SBD estimates to produce a Mean Squared Error (MSE) estimate for each study site. In order to estimate individual-level SBD coverage, these MSE values were applied to SBD estimates from the control arm of the DeWorm3 trial, where only school-level reporting of SBD coverage had been collected. In each study site, SBD coverage in the school-level datasets was substantially higher than that obtained from individual-level datasets, indicating possible overestimation of school-level SBD coverage. When applying observed MSE to project expected coverages in the control arm, SBD coverage dropped from 89.1% to 70.5% (p-value < 0.001) in Benin, from 97.7% to 84.5% (p-value < 0.001) in India, and from 41.5% to 37.5% (p-value < 0.001) in Malawi.Conclusions/significanceThese estimates indicate that school-level SBD reporting is likely to significantly overestimate program coverage. These findings suggest that current SBD coverage estimates derived from school-based program data may substantially overestimate true pediatric deworming coverage within targeted communities.Trial registrationNCT03014167.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
19352727 and 19352735
Volume :
17
Issue :
4
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.f405a9bd09414084b5631646a6272471
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010401