Sorry, I don't understand your search. ×
Back to Search Start Over

A population‐based meta‐analysis of circulating GFAP for cognition and dementia risk

Authors :
Mitzi M. Gonzales
Crystal Wiedner
Chen‐Pin Wang
Qianqian Liu
Joshua C. Bis
Zhiguang Li
Jayandra J. Himali
Saptaparni Ghosh
Emy A. Thomas
Danielle M. Parent
Tiffany F. Kautz
Matthew P. Pase
Hugo J. Aparicio
Luc Djoussé
Kenneth J. Mukamal
Bruce M. Psaty
William T. Longstreth Jr
Thomas H. Mosley Jr
Vilmundur Gudnason
Djass Mbangdadji
Oscar L. Lopez
Kristine Yaffe
Stephen Sidney
R. Nick Bryan
Ilya M. Nasrallah
Charles S. DeCarli
Alexa S. Beiser
Lenore J. Launer
Myriam Fornage
Russell P. Tracy
Sudha Seshadri
Claudia L. Satizabal
Source :
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology, Vol 9, Iss 10, Pp 1574-1585 (2022)
Publication Year :
2022
Publisher :
Wiley, 2022.

Abstract

Abstract Objective Expression of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), a marker of reactive astrocytosis, colocalizes with neuropathology in the brain. Blood levels of GFAP have been associated with cognitive decline and dementia status. However, further examinations at a population‐based level are necessary to broaden generalizability to community settings. Methods Circulating GFAP levels were assayed using a Simoa HD‐1 analyzer in 4338 adults without prevalent dementia from four longitudinal community‐based cohort studies. The associations between GFAP levels with general cognition, total brain volume, and hippocampal volume were evaluated with separate linear regression models in each cohort with adjustment for age, sex, education, race, diabetes, systolic blood pressure, antihypertensive medication, body mass index, apolipoprotein E ε4 status, site, and time between GFAP blood draw and the outcome. Associations with incident all‐cause and Alzheimer's disease dementia were evaluated with adjusted Cox proportional hazard models. Meta‐analysis was performed on the estimates derived from each cohort using random‐effects models. Results Meta‐analyses indicated that higher circulating GFAP associated with lower general cognition (ß = −0.09, [95% confidence interval [CI]: −0.15 to −0.03], p = 0.005), but not with total brain or hippocampal volume (p > 0.05). However, each standard deviation unit increase in log‐transformed GFAP levels was significantly associated with a 2.5‐fold higher risk of incident all‐cause dementia (Hazard Ratio [HR]: 2.47 (95% CI: 1.52–4.01)) and Alzheimer's disease dementia (HR: 2.54 [95% CI: 1.42–4.53]) over up to 15‐years of follow‐up. Interpretation Results support the potential role of circulating GFAP levels for aiding dementia risk prediction and improving clinical trial stratification in community settings.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
23289503
Volume :
9
Issue :
10
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.f62e692ace824cb49e09951b82e5f859
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/acn3.51652