Back to Search Start Over

Acceptability of internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy (i-CBT) for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD): a systematic review

Authors :
Natalie Simon
Leah McGillivray
Neil P. Roberts
Kali Barawi
Catrin E. Lewis
Jonathan I. Bisson
Source :
European Journal of Psychotraumatology, Vol 10, Iss 1 (2019)
Publication Year :
2019
Publisher :
Taylor & Francis Group, 2019.

Abstract

Background: Internet-delivered Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (i-CBT) offers potential as an alternative, accessible, clinically and cost-effective treatment for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), but little is known about its acceptability. Objective: To review the available evidence to understand the acceptability of i-CBT for PTSD. Method: We undertook a mixed-methods systematic review according to Cochrane Collaboration Guidelines, of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of i-CBT for adults with PTSD. We examined included studies for measures of acceptability, and possible proxy indicators of acceptability, including dropout rates, which were meta-analysed as risk ratios (RRs). Results: Ten studies with 720 participants were included. We found i-CBT to be acceptable according to specific acceptability measures, and suggestions for acceptability according to some proxy measures of i-CBT programme usage. There was, however, evidence of greater dropout from i-CBT than waitlist (RR 1.39, CI 1.03–1.88; 8 studies; participants = 585) and no evidence of a difference in dropout between i-CBT and i-non-CBT (RR 2.14, CI 0.97–4.73; participants = 132; 2 studies). Conclusion: i-CBT appears a potentially acceptable intervention for adults with PTSD. We identified clinical and research questions, including the status of proxy indicators, and call for standardised, consistent treatment acceptability measurement.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20008066 and 20008198
Volume :
10
Issue :
1
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
European Journal of Psychotraumatology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.f795e3d15b5c4a99b1c99297edcedd92
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2019.1646092