Wireless versus routine physiologic monitoring after cesarean delivery to reduce maternal morbidity and mortality in a resource-limited setting: protocol of type 2 hybrid effectiveness-implementation study

MLA

Adeline A. Boatin, et al. “Wireless versus Routine Physiologic Monitoring after Cesarean Delivery to Reduce Maternal Morbidity and Mortality in a Resource-Limited Setting: Protocol of Type 2 Hybrid Effectiveness-Implementation Study.” BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, vol. 21, no. 1, Feb. 2021, pp. 1–12. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03550-w.

APA

Adeline A. Boatin, Joseph Ngonzi, Blair J. Wylie, Henry M. Lugobe, Lisa M. Bebell, Godfrey Mugyenyi, Sudi Mohamed, Kenia Martinez, Nicholas Musinguzi, Christina Psaros, Joshua P. Metlay, & Jessica E. Haberer. (2021). Wireless versus routine physiologic monitoring after cesarean delivery to reduce maternal morbidity and mortality in a resource-limited setting: protocol of type 2 hybrid effectiveness-implementation study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 21(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03550-w

Chicago

Adeline A. Boatin, Joseph Ngonzi, Blair J. Wylie, Henry M. Lugobe, Lisa M. Bebell, Godfrey Mugyenyi, Sudi Mohamed, et al. 2021. “Wireless versus Routine Physiologic Monitoring after Cesarean Delivery to Reduce Maternal Morbidity and Mortality in a Resource-Limited Setting: Protocol of Type 2 Hybrid Effectiveness-Implementation Study.” BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 21 (1): 1–12. doi:10.1186/s12884-021-03550-w.