Back to Search Start Over

Prognostic Significance of NLR and PLR in COVID-19: A Multi-Cohort Validation Study

Authors :
Marta Colaneri
Camilla Genovese
Federico Fassio
Marta Canuti
Andrea Giacomelli
Anna Lisa Ridolfo
Erika Asperges
Giuseppe Albi
Raffaele Bruno
Spinello Antinori
Antonio Muscatello
Bianca Mariani
Ciro Canetta
Francesco Blasi
Alessandra Bandera
Andrea Gori
Source :
Infectious Diseases and Therapy, Vol 13, Iss 5, Pp 1147-1157 (2024)
Publication Year :
2024
Publisher :
Adis, Springer Healthcare, 2024.

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Recent studies have highlighted the prognostic value of easily accessible inflammatory markers, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) for predicting severe outcomes in patients affected by Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Our study validates NLR and PLR cut-off values from a prior cohort at IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo (OSM) of Pavia, Italy, across two new cohorts from different hospitals. This aims to enhance the generalizability of these prognostic indicators. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, conducted at Milan’s Ospedale Luigi Sacco (OLS) and IRCCS Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico (OMP) hospitals, we assess the predictive capacity of NLR and PLR for three main outcomes—non-invasive ventilation (NIV) or continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) usage, invasive ventilation (IV), and death—in patients with COVID-19 at admission. For each outcome, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were computed separately for male and female cohorts. Distinct NLR and PLR cut-off values were used for men (7.00, 7.29, 7.00 for NLR; 239.22, 248.00, 250.39 for PLR) and women (6.36, 7.00, 6.28 for NLR; 233.00, 246.45, 241.54 for PLR), retrieved from the first cohort at OSM. Results A total of 3599 patients were included in our study, 1842 from OLS and 1757 from OMP. OLS and OMP sensitivity values for both NLR and PLR (NLR: 24–67%, PLR: 40–64%) were inferior to specificity values (NLR: 64–76%, PLR: 55–72%). Additionally, PPVs generally remained lower ( 82%) compared to NPVs for CPAP/NIV. Conclusions Consistent findings across diverse patient populations validate the reliability and applicability of NLR and PLR cut-off values. High NPVs emphasize their role in identifying individuals less likely to experience severe outcomes. These markers not only aid in risk stratification but also guide resource allocation in emergencies or limited-resource situations.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
21938229 and 21936382
Volume :
13
Issue :
5
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Infectious Diseases and Therapy
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.fcf5d8b718884876949e3eb7e1f62934
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40121-024-00967-6