Back to Search Start Over

Comparison of clinical effectiveness of conventional and self-etch sealant: a split mouth randomized controlled trial [version 3; peer review: 2 approved]

Authors :
Deveshi Gupta
Arathi Rao
Ramya Shenoy
Baranya Srikrishna Suprabha
Author Affiliations :
<relatesTo>1</relatesTo>Pediatric & Preventive Dentistry, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 575001, India<br /><relatesTo>2</relatesTo>Public Health Dentistry, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 575001, India
Source :
F1000Research. 11:261
Publication Year :
2022
Publisher :
London, UK: F1000 Research Limited, 2022.

Abstract

Background: Self-etching has been shown to be beneficial compared to the other resin sealants especially in pediatric practice. The present in-vivo study was designed to clinically evaluate the sealing ability and retention of the self-etching sealant compared to the conventional resin sealant. The aim was to evaluate and compare the retention and marginal integrity of the self-etch and acid etch sealant materials at three, six and twelve-month follow up. Methods: The study was designed as a double blinded, split mouth randomized controlled trial, . In total, 35 children (70 teeth) between 7 and 10 years of age formed part of the study. Group 1 received acid-etch sealant and Group 2 received self-etch sealants. The study participants and the investigator who performed the statistical analysis were blinded to the treatment allocation. All the samples were evaluated at 3, 6, and 12 months. The inter-group and intragroup comparison were carried out using the Chi-Square test and Friedman test with level of significance set at 5% and the P value less than 0.05. Results: Complete retention of sealants was observed in 34.5% of conventional acid etch (group 1) and 22.9% of self-etch samples (group 2) whereas complete loss of sealants were seen in 11.4% of group 1 and 20% of the group 2 samples and intergroup comparison of retention failure was non-significant (p=0.135). In total, 85.7% of the group 1 and 82.9% of the group 2 samples exhibited good marginal integrity with no clinical changes in the enamel around the margins but this was not statistically significant (p=0.5). Conclusions: Sealants with fewer procedural steps and those which provide adequate retention would be ideal for use in children. Thus, self-etch sealants have been found to be effective and efficient as a sealant in the present in-vivo study. Clinical Trials Registry, India registration: CTRI/2019/03/018343 (29/03/2019).

Details

ISSN :
20461402
Volume :
11
Database :
F1000Research
Journal :
F1000Research
Notes :
Revised Amendments from Version 2 In the Introduction: The last paragraph of the Introduction the objective was rephrased as The objective of this study was to evaluate the retention of the sealant material and marginal enamel changes at 3, 6 and 12-months following sealant placement. In the methods section: Blinding The following lines from blinding was moved under the heading ethical approval. The trial commenced from December 2019 to April 2020 and all the follow-up examinations were completed by 15th April 2021. The following line was removed from blinding and placed in the intervention section. Both the study materials were purchased by the investigators and were used within their labelled shelf life. Results The first sentence was modified as 50 children were screened initially and 38 (76 teeth) of them were selected based on the inclusion criteria., , [version 3; peer review: 2 approved]
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsfor.10.12688.f1000research.109584.3
Document Type :
research-article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.109584.3