Back to Search
Start Over
Paravertebral vs. Epidural Analgesia for Liver Surgery (PEALS): Protocol for a randomized controlled pilot study [version 3; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]
- Source :
- F1000Research. 11:1067
- Publication Year :
- 2024
- Publisher :
- London, UK: F1000 Research Limited, 2024.
-
Abstract
- Background Perioperative thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) is commonly used in hepatectomy patients since it is opioid-sparing. However, TEA has a high failure rate and is associated with potentially devastating complications (spinal haematoma) and the risk is increased with hepatectomy. Thus, some centres favour systemic opioid-based modalities which, in turn, are associated with inferior analgesia and well-known risks/side-effects. Hence, alternative analgesic methods are desirable. Paravertebral block (PVB) has been used in liver resection with advantages including haemodynamic stability, low failure rates, and low risk of spinal haematoma. The purpose of this pilot RCT is to compare continuous TEA (traditional standard of care is local anesthetic (LA) + opioids) with PVB (traditional standard of care is with LA without opioid) for patients undergoing hepatectomy. We hypothesise that pain outcomes will be comparable between groups, but PVB patients will require fewer perioperative vasopressors/blood products, have fewer opioid-related side effects and a shorter hospital length of stay. Methods With ethics approval, this non-inferiority, pilot RCT with a convenience sample of 50 hepatectomy patients will examine whether PVB imparts analgesia comparable to TEA but with fewer adverse effects. Primary outcomes are surrogates of analgesia for 72 h postoperatively (i.e., opioid consumption, time to first analgesic request and pain scores at rest and with coughing); Secondary outcomes are blood products/fluids administered; side effects/complications until 72 h postoperatively; length of hospital stay. The results will be used to plan a large multicentre trial comparing TEA vs. PVB in hepatectomy patients. This study has a high potential to positively impact the quality/safety of patient care. ClinicalTrials.gov registration NCT02909322 (09-21-2016); Available at URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT0290932
Details
- ISSN :
- 20461402
- Volume :
- 11
- Database :
- F1000Research
- Journal :
- F1000Research
- Notes :
- Revised Amendments from Version 2 Changes made between versions 2 and 3: Revised the Abstract, Introduction and Discussion to make it clear that our purpose is to compare 2 anaesthesia practices (as opposed to 2 anaesthesia techniques) for the management of postoperative pain in hepatectomy patients. Specifically, our goal is to compare thoracic epidural anaesthesia with opioid and local anaesthetic to paravertebral (PVB) block with only local anaesthetic. Our hypothesis is that pain outcomes will be comparable between groups but those receiving PVB will require fewer perioperative vasopressors/ blood products, have fewer opioid-related sided effects and have a shorter hospital stay because they did not receive opioids., , [version 3; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- edsfor.10.12688.f1000research.121987.3
- Document Type :
- other
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.121987.3