Back to Search Start Over

Effectiveness of Tunnelling Modification Technique Using Platelet-rich Fibrin and Connective Tissue Graft in Gingival Recession: A Systematic Review [version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review]

Authors :
Popy Sandra
Esti Cahyani Adiati
Nurul Khairiyah
Benso Sulijaya
Yuniarti Soeroso
Author Affiliations :
<relatesTo>1</relatesTo>Postgraduate Program in Periodontology, Department of Periodontology, Universitas Indonesia, Central Jakarta, Jakarta, Indonesia<br /><relatesTo>2</relatesTo>Department of Periodontology, Universitas Indonesia, Central Jakarta, Jakarta, Indonesia
Source :
F1000Research. 13:842
Publication Year :
2024
Publisher :
London, UK: F1000 Research Limited, 2024.

Abstract

Background Gingival recession is a concern in aesthetic and functional perspective. The tunneling technique (TT) is one of the effective root coverage treatments in some gingival recession defects and is associated with favorable outcomes. This paper aims to evaluate the effectiveness of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) and connective tissue graft (CTG) in gingival recession treatment with TT. Methods This systematic review used the PRISMA method and electronic bibliographic searches were conducted on seven databases (Google Scholar, Wiley, Pubmed, Sage, Ovid Technologies, Quintessence Publishing, Springer) from December 2018 to January 2023. The search focused on randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that reported TT outcomes in the treatment of Miller class I and II recession with a minimum of six months follow-up. Results Three out of 399 studies met the inclusion criteria. The three selected studies presented PRF and CTG use in multiple gingival recessions to evaluate tissue condition and clinical parameters before and after the surgical procedure. The clinical parameters evaluated were probing pocket depth (PPD), recession width (RW), width of keratinized gingiva (WKG), and vertical depth of recession (VDR). TT with PRF and TT with CTG is effective in treating gingival recession. PRF is well accepted by patients with a less invasive procedure compared to the CTG procedure. However, TT with CTG showed better results in all parameters at follow-up. Conclusions TT with PRF can be used as an alternative to treat some gingival recession defects. However, TT with CTG produced better clinical results in recession closure.

Details

ISSN :
20461402
Volume :
13
Database :
F1000Research
Journal :
F1000Research
Notes :
[version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review]
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsfor.10.12688.f1000research.152557.1
Document Type :
systematic-review
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.152557.1