Back to Search Start Over

Impact of interventions including vaccination against Neisseria meningitidis on the frequency of meningitis in the African meningitis belt: a scoping review protocol [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]

Authors :
Niurka Molina
Greissi Justiniani
Lisset Urquiza
Maria Eugenia Toledo
Chukwuemeka Onwuchekwa
Kristien Verdonck
Ermias Diro
Nivaldo Linares-Pérez
Author Affiliations :
<relatesTo>1</relatesTo>Instituto de Medicina Tropical Pedro Kourí, Havana, Cuba<br /><relatesTo>2</relatesTo>Instituto Finlay de Vacunas, Havana, Cuba<br /><relatesTo>3</relatesTo>Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium<br /><relatesTo>4</relatesTo>University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia
Source :
F1000Research. 8:1922
Publication Year :
2019
Publisher :
London, UK: F1000 Research Limited, 2019.

Abstract

In the African meningitis belt (region from Senegal to Ethiopia), there are around 30,000 reported cases of meningococcal disease per year. The main aetiological agent is Neisseria meningitidis of serogroup A. Since 2010, vaccination efforts have increased and hundreds of millions of people have been vaccinated. There are indications that the epidemiology of meningococcal disease is changing. This is the protocol of a scoping review, the objective of which is to describe the extent and nature of the research evidence about the impact of vaccination on meningitis frequency. Primary studies and reviews are eligible for inclusion in the review if they assess the impact of interventions that include N. meningitidis vaccination in countries of the African meningitis belt, report meningitis frequencies, and include an element of comparison. The sources of records are electronic databases (MEDLINE, Cochrane register of clinical trials, African Index Medicus, and clinicaltrials.gov), surveillance reports at country level, online resources of large stakeholders involved in vaccination, reference lists of included records, and experts in the field. The search strategy is based on the combination of the condition of interest, the intervention, and the geographical region. The findings of this review will be presented using figures, tables, and thematic narrative synthesis. This review will not produce a pooled estimate of what the impact of vaccination is, but will give insight in how the authors of the included records assessed the impact.

Details

ISSN :
20461402
Volume :
8
Database :
F1000Research
Journal :
F1000Research
Notes :
[version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsfor.10.12688.f1000research.21164.1
Document Type :
study-protocol
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.21164.1