Back to Search Start Over

Early lessons from schistosomiasis mass drug administration programs [version 1; referees: 3 approved]

Authors :
W. Evan Secor
Author Affiliations :
<relatesTo>1</relatesTo>Parasitic Diseases Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Center for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA
Source :
F1000Research. 4:F1000 Faculty Rev-1157
Publication Year :
2015
Publisher :
London, UK: F1000 Research Limited, 2015.

Abstract

Mass drug administration using praziquantel is the backbone of the current strategy for the control of schistosomiasis. As the theoretical plans have moved into practical application, certain challenges with this approach have surfaced, and it is likely that annual mass drug administration alone may not be sufficient to achieve program goals. However, mass drug administration is still the only available intervention that can be readily used in the wide variety of settings where schistosomiasis is endemic. The task then becomes how to improve this approach and identify what adjuncts to mass drug administration are effective, as programs move from morbidity control to elimination goals. Other aspects worthy of consideration include how best to employ new diagnostic tools to more easily identify where treatment is needed, and new formulations of praziquantel to extend the availability of treatment to all age groups. The aim of this review is to highlight both areas of challenge and of opportunity to improve the public health impact of schistosomiasis control programs.

Details

ISSN :
20461402
Volume :
4
Database :
F1000Research
Journal :
F1000Research
Notes :
Editorial Note on the Review Process F1000 Faculty Reviews are commissioned from members of the prestigious F1000 Faculty and are edited as a service to readers. In order to make these reviews as comprehensive and accessible as possible, the referees provide input before publication and only the final, revised version is published. The referees who approved the final version are listed with their names and affiliations but without their reports on earlier versions (any comments will already have been addressed in the published version). The referees who approved this article are: David Rollinson, Wolfson Wellcome Biomedical Laboratories, Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, London, UK No competing interests were disclosed. Alan Fenwick, Faculty of Medicine, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK No competing interests were disclosed. Don McManus, Molecular Parasitology Laboratory, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Queensland, Australia No competing interests were disclosed., , [version 1; referees: 3 approved]
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsfor.10.12688.f1000research.6826.1
Document Type :
review
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.6826.1