Back to Search
Start Over
Dry textile electrode for ambulatory monitoring after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: A pilot study of simultaneous comparison to the Holter electrocardiogram [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
- Source :
- F1000Research. 11:97
- Publication Year :
- 2022
- Publisher :
- London, UK: F1000 Research Limited, 2022.
-
Abstract
- Background: Holter electrocardiogram (ECG) is the gold standard for ambulatory monitoring of atrial fibrillation (AF) but it is insufficient because of its limited recording time. Although several consumer ECG devices provide longer recording time, they generally do not undergo the regulatory process for medical use. Furthermore, current medical-grade devices for longer ECG monitoring are not continuous or too invasive for AF monitoring. A wearable ECG with a medical-grade dry textile electrode is a promising technology to remedy this limitation. This pilot study aimed to simultaneously compare the wearable and Holter ECGs for ambulatory monitoring in a clinical setting. Methods: This prospective observational study enrolled 18 patients who underwent AF ablation. One day after AF ablation, ambulatory ECG was obtained for three hours simultaneously using both the wearable and Holter ECG devices. Automatic ECG interpretations between devices were compared with correlation and agreement analyses. Results: Simultaneous ECG monitoring demonstrated a comparable analysis time and total heart beats between the two devices. Almost complete correlation and agreement were also demonstrated in all clinically relevant testing aspects except in R-wave amplitude (r = 0.743, p < .001). AF was detected in three patients. AF duration was the same in both ECG devices in two patients with continuous AF. In the remaining patient with intermittent AF, AF duration was shortened by 0.6% with the wearable ECG as compared to that with the Holter ECG. Conclusions: Simultaneous ECG comparison revealed a high consistency between the wearable and Holter ECG devices. The results of this study warrant further clinical studies for long-term monitoring of ambulatory ECG after AF ablation.
Details
- ISSN :
- 20461402
- Volume :
- 11
- Database :
- F1000Research
- Journal :
- F1000Research
- Notes :
- Revised Amendments from Version 1 According to the reviewer's request, we have added a new figure showing simultaneous electrode placement of the two systems to the study design of the revised methods section. Previous figures #1 to 3 have been renumbered as figures #2 to 4 according to this change. In response to the reviewer’s question, a strength of ECG monitoring using the hitoe electrode has been described in the background section of the revised abstract as follows. “Although several consumer ECG devices provide longer recording time, they generally do not undergo the regulatory process for medical use. Furthermore, current medical-grade devices for longer ECG monitoring are not continuous or too invasive for AF monitoring.” We have deleted the description of McNemar’s test from the statistical analysis of the revised methods section. Because categorical variables of the patient characteristics were identical between the two devices, there was no need for comparison. This correction owes the reviewer to her appropriate pointing out. According to the reviewer’s request, detailed methods including an approach to artifact removal have been clarified in the methods section of the revised manuscript. According to the reviewer’s request, we have defined the CHADS2 score in the revised results section as follows. “The CHADS2 score estimates stroke-risk in AF, which includes chronic heart failure, hypertension, diabetes, and age ≥75 years for one point each, and history of stroke or transient ischemic attack as two points.” We have added a new reference to the revised discussion section for responding to the reviewer’s comments on impact of gender differences and sweat on ECG recording using the hitoe electrode. According to this change, previous references #20 and # 21 have been renumbered as references #21 and # 22 respectively., , [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- edsfor.10.12688.f1000research.75712.2
- Document Type :
- research-article
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.75712.2