Back to Search Start Over

Time for sharing data to become routine: the seven excuses for not doing so are all invalid [version 1; referees: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]

Authors :
Richard Smith
Ian Roberts
Author Affiliations :
<relatesTo>1</relatesTo>ICDDR, B, Dhaka, Bangladesh<br /><relatesTo>2</relatesTo>Former editor, BMJ, London, UK<br /><relatesTo>3</relatesTo>Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK<br /><relatesTo>4</relatesTo>Clinical Trials Unit, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
Source :
F1000Research. 5:781
Publication Year :
2016
Publisher :
London, UK: F1000 Research Limited, 2016.

Abstract

Data are more valuable than scientific papers but researchers are incentivised to publish papers not share data. Patients are the main beneficiaries of data sharing but researchers have several incentives not to share: others might use their data to get ahead in the academic rat race; they might be scooped; their results might not be replicable; competitors may reach different conclusions; their data management might be exposed as poor; patient confidentiality might be breached; and technical difficulties make sharing impossible. All of these barriers can be overcome and researchers should be rewarded for sharing data. Data sharing must become routine.

Details

ISSN :
20461402
Volume :
5
Database :
F1000Research
Journal :
F1000Research
Notes :
[version 1; referees: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsfor.10.12688.f1000research.8422.1
Document Type :
opinion-article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.8422.1