Back to Search
Start Over
Horizontal gene transfer: essentiality and evolvability in prokaryotes, and roles in evolutionary transitions [version 1; referees: 2 approved]
- Source :
- F1000Research. 5:F1000 Faculty Rev-1805
- Publication Year :
- 2016
- Publisher :
- London, UK: F1000 Research Limited, 2016.
-
Abstract
- The wide spread of gene exchange and loss in the prokaryotic world has prompted the concept of ‘lateral genomics’ to the point of an outright denial of the relevance of phylogenetic trees for evolution. However, the pronounced coherence congruence of the topologies of numerous gene trees, particularly those for (nearly) universal genes, translates into the notion of a statistical tree of life (STOL), which reflects a central trend of vertical evolution. The STOL can be employed as a framework for reconstruction of the evolutionary processes in the prokaryotic world. Quantitatively, however, horizontal gene transfer (HGT) dominates microbial evolution, with the rate of gene gain and loss being comparable to the rate of point mutations and much greater than the duplication rate. Theoretical models of evolution suggest that HGT is essential for the survival of microbial populations that otherwise deteriorate due to the Muller’s ratchet effect. Apparently, at least some bacteria and archaea evolved dedicated vehicles for gene transfer that evolved from selfish elements such as plasmids and viruses. Recent phylogenomic analyses suggest that episodes of massive HGT were pivotal for the emergence of major groups of organisms such as multiple archaeal phyla as well as eukaryotes. Similar analyses appear to indicate that, in addition to donating hundreds of genes to the emerging eukaryotic lineage, mitochondrial endosymbiosis severely curtailed HGT. These results shed new light on the routes of evolutionary transitions, but caution is due given the inherent uncertainty of deep phylogenies.
Details
- ISSN :
- 20461402
- Volume :
- 5
- Database :
- F1000Research
- Journal :
- F1000Research
- Notes :
- Editorial Note on the Review Process F1000 Faculty Reviews are commissioned from members of the prestigious F1000 Faculty and are edited as a service to readers. In order to make these reviews as comprehensive and accessible as possible, the referees provide input before publication and only the final, revised version is published. The referees who approved the final version are listed with their names and affiliations but without their reports on earlier versions (any comments will already have been addressed in the published version). The referees who approved this article are: Olga Zhaxybayeva, Department of Biological Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA No competing interests were disclosed. Purificacion Lopez-Garcia, Unité d'Ecologie, Systématique et Evolution, Université Paris-Sud, Orsay, France No competing interests were disclosed., , [version 1; referees: 2 approved]
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- edsfor.10.12688.f1000research.8737.1
- Document Type :
- review
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.8737.1