Dogs, Canis familiaris, fail to copy intransitive actions in third-party contextual imitation tasks

To link to full-text access for this article, visit this link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.03.008 Byline: Claudio Tennie (a), Eileen Glabsch (a), Sebastian Tempelmann (a)(b), Juliane Brauer (a), Juliane Kaminski (a)(c), Josep Call (a) Abstract: Contextual imitation of intransitive actions within a third-party copying setting was tested in 180 household dogs. A demonstrator dog, in sight of observer dogs, performed one of two trained actions upon hearing verbal commands given by an experimenter. Observer dogs were later tested to see whether they produced more target actions than control groups who had not seen demonstrations of those actions. In all conditions, except one, the demonstrated actions had been previously trained in the observer dogs by their owners, but had been attached to a different verbal command to that used in our study. For these 'pretrained' actions we further investigated whether reward contingency, the relationship of the dog to the human experimenter and ostensive cues had an effect. In no condition did we find any contextual imitation. A subsample of all tested dogs had, during their lifetimes, received extensive training in a diverse range of tasks outside of social learning, but this background similarly did not lead to contextual imitation. We conclude that dogs, even when highly trained, fail to show evidence of contextual imitation for intransitive actions within a third-party copying paradigm. Author Affiliation: (a) Department of Comparitive Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Germany (b) Department of Psychology, University of Portsmouth, U.K. (c) Sub-Department of Animal Behaviour, University of Cambridge, U.K. Article History: Received 19 August 2008; Revised 15 October 2008; Accepted 9 March 2009 Article Note: (miscellaneous) MS. number: 08-00548R