Back to Search Start Over

The safety of adult male circumcision in HIV-infected and uninfected men in Rakai, Uganda

Authors :
Kigozi, Godfrey
Gray, Ronald H.
Wawer, Maria J.
Serwadda, David
Makumbi, Frederick
Watya, Stephen
Nalugoda, Fred
Kiwanuka, Noah
Moulton, Lawrence H.
Chen, Michael Z.
Sewankambo, Nelson K.
Wabwire-Mangen, Fred
Bacon, Melanie C.
Ridzon, Renee
Opendi, Pius
Sempijja, Victor
Settuba, Absolom
Buwembo, Denis
Kiggundu, Valerian
Anyokorit, Margaret
Nkale, James
Kighoma, Nehemia
Charvat, Blake
Source :
PLoS Medicine. June, 2008, Vol. 5 Issue 6, p911, 8 p.
Publication Year :
2008

Abstract

Background The objective of the study was to compare rates of adverse events (AEs) related to male circumcision (MQ in HIV-positive and HIV-negative men in order to provide guidance for MC programs that may provide services to HIV-infected and uninfected men. Methods and Findings A total of 2,326 HIV-negative and 420 HIV-positive men (World Health Organization [WHO] stage I or II and CD4 counts > 350 cells/m[m.sup.3]) were circumcised in two separate but procedurally identical trials of MC for HIV and/or sexually transmitted infection prevention in rural Rakai, Uganda. Participants were followed at 1-2 d and 5-9 d, and at 4-6 wk, to assess surgery-related AEs, wound healing, and resumption of intercourse. AE risks and wound healing were compared in HIV-positive and HIV-negative men. Adjusted odds ratios (AdjORs) were estimated by multiple logistic regression, adjusting for baseline characteristics and post-operative resumption of sex. At enrollment, HIV-positive men were older, more likely to be married, reported more sexual partners, less condom use, and higher rates of sexually transmitted disease symptoms than HIV-negative men. Risks of moderate or severe AEs were 3.1/100 and 3.5/100 in HIV-positive and HIV-negative participants, respectively (AdjOR 0.91, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.47-1.74). Infections were the most common AEs (2.6/100 in HIV-positive versus 3.0/100 in HIV-negative men). Risks of other complications were similar in the two groups. The proportion with completed healing by 6 wk postsurgery was 92.7% in HIV-positive men and 95.8% in HIV-negative men (p = 0.007). AEs were more common in men who resumed intercourse before wound healing compared to those who waited (AdjOR 1.56,95% Cl 1.05-2.33). Conclusions Overall, the safety of MC was comparable in asymptornatic HIV-positive and HIV-negative men, although healing was somewhat slower among the HIV infected. All men should be strongly counseled to refrain from intercourse until full wound healing is achieved. Trial registration: http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov; for HIV-negative men #NCT00425984 and for HIV-positive men, #NCT00124878. The Editors'Summory of this article follows the references.<br />Introduction Three randomized trials have shown that male circumcision (MC) reduces the risk of male HIV acquisition in men by 50%-60% [1-3]. This finding suggests that the procedure may be [...]

Subjects

Subjects :
Biological sciences

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
15491277
Volume :
5
Issue :
6
Database :
Gale General OneFile
Journal :
PLoS Medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsgcl.202254604