Back to Search Start Over

Gas turbine engine emissions--part I: volatile organic compounds and nitrogen oxides

Authors :
Timko, Michael T.
Herndon, Scott C.
Wood, Ezra C.
Onasch, Timothy B.
Northway, Megan J.
Jayne, John T.
Canagaratna, Manjula R.
Miake-Lye, Richard C.
Knighton, W. Berk
Source :
Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power. June, 2010, Vol. 132 Issue 6, p61504, 14 p.
Publication Year :
2010

Abstract

The potential human health and environmental impacts of aircraft gas turbine engine emissions during normal airport operation are issues of growing concern. During the JETS/Aircraft Particle Emissions eXperiment(APEX)-2 and APEX-3 field campaigns, we performed an extensive series of gas phase and particulate emissions measurements of on-wing gas turbine engines. In all, nine different CFM56 style engines (including both CFM56-3BI and -7B22 models) and seven additional engines (two RB211-535E4-B engines, three AE3007 engines, one PW4158, and one CJ6108A) were studied to evaluate engine-to-engine variability. Specific gas-phase measurements include N[O.sub.2], NO, and total N[O.sub.x], HCHO, [C.sub.2][H.sub.4], CO, and a range of volatile organic compounds (e.g., benzene, styrene, toluene, naphthalene). A number of broad conclusions can be made based on the gas-phase data set: (1)field measurements of gas-phase emission indices (EIs) are generally consistent with 1CAO certification values; (2) speciation of gas phase N[O.sub.x] between NO and N[O.sub.2] is reproducible for different engine types and favors N[O.sub.2] at low power (and low fuel flow rate) and NO at high power (high fuel flow rate); (3) emission indices of gas-phase organic compounds and CO decrease rapidly with increasing fuel flow rate; (4) plotting EI-CO or volatile organic compound Els against fuel flow rate collapses much of the variability between the different engines, with one exception (AE3007); (5) HCHO, ethylene, acetaldehyde, and propene are the most abundant volatile organic compounds present in the exhaust gases that we can detect, independent of engine technology differences. Empirical correlations accurate to within 30% and based on the publicly available engine parameters are presented for estimating El-N[O.sub.x] and EI-N[O.sub.2]. Engine-to-engine variability, unavailability of combustor input conditions, changing ambient temperatures, and complex reaction dynamics limit the accuracy of global correlations for CO or volatile organic compound EIs. [DOI: 10.1115/1.4000131 ]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
07424795
Volume :
132
Issue :
6
Database :
Gale General OneFile
Journal :
Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsgcl.228172134