Awareness of both type 1 and 2 errors in climate science and assessment: climate science and assessment sometimes focus too strongly on avoiding false-positive errors, when false-negative errors may be just as important

MLA

Anderegg, William R. L., et al. “Awareness of Both Type 1 and 2 Errors in Climate Science and Assessment: Climate Science and Assessment Sometimes Focus Too Strongly on Avoiding False-Positive Errors, When False-Negative Errors May Be Just as Important.” Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, vol. 95, no. 9, Sept. 2014, p. 1445. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00115.1.

APA

Anderegg, W. R. L., Callaway, E. S., Boykoff, M. T., Yohe, G., & Root, T. L. (2014). Awareness of both type 1 and 2 errors in climate science and assessment: climate science and assessment sometimes focus too strongly on avoiding false-positive errors, when false-negative errors may be just as important. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 95(9), 1445. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00115.1

Chicago

Anderegg, William R.L., Elizabeth S. Callaway, Maxwell T. Boykoff, Gary Yohe, and Terry L. Root. 2014. “Awareness of Both Type 1 and 2 Errors in Climate Science and Assessment: Climate Science and Assessment Sometimes Focus Too Strongly on Avoiding False-Positive Errors, When False-Negative Errors May Be Just as Important.” Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 95 (9): 1445. doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00115.1.