Could preprocedural ultrasound increase the first-pass success rate of neuraxial anesthesia in obstetrics? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Author(s): Lianxiang Jiang [sup.1], Fang Zhang [sup.1], Na Wei [sup.2], Jingjing Lv [sup.1], Wei Chen [sup.1], Zeping Dai [sup.1] Author Affiliations: (1) grid.452929.1, Department of Anaesthesia, The First Affiliated Hospital [...]
Neuraxial anesthesia is a common practice in obstetrics. Evidence suggests that preprocedural ultrasound versus the conventional landmark location method accurately identifies a given intervertebral space and predicts the needle insertion depth required to reach the spinal canal. However, whether the preprocedural ultrasound examination improves the first-pass success (FPS) rate remains elusive. Major databases were systematically searched for all relevant studies published in English up to June 2019. Eighteen randomized controlled trials including 1844 patients were enrolled. The quality of eligible studies was assessed, and predefined outcomes were synthesized by meta-analysis. The primary results showed that preprocedural ultrasound increased the FPS rate in patients with predicted puncture difficulty but not in patients who were easily punctured. Preprocedural ultrasound reduced the number of redirections and punctures and decreased the incidence of vascular puncture and backache. There was no evidence of a reduction in failed punctures. We also noted that preprocedural ultrasound prolonged the identification time but not the procedure time. Thus, this systematic review provides evidence that preprocedural ultrasound does not improve the FPS rate of neuraxial anesthesia in patients who are easily palpated, although it increases the FPS rate in patients who are difficult to palpate.