Back to Search Start Over

Development of the Instrument to assess the Credibility of Effect Modification Analyses (ICEMAN) in randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses

Authors :
Schandelmaier, Stefan
Briel, Matthias
Varadhan, Ravi
Schmid, Christopher H.
Devasenapathy, Niveditha
Hayward, Rodney A.
Gagnier, Joel
Borenstein, Michael
van der Heijden, Geert J.M.G.
Dahabreh, Issa J.
Sun, Xin
Sauerbrei, Willi
Walsh, Michael
Ioannidis, John P.A.
Thabane, Lehana
Guyatt, Gordon H.
Source :
CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal. August 10, 2020, Vol. 192 Issue 32, pE901, 6 p.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Most randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and meta-analyses of RCTs examine effect modification (also called a subgroup effect or interaction), in which the effect of an intervention varies by another variable (e.g., age or disease severity). Assessing the credibility of an apparent effect modification presents challenges; therefore, we developed the Instrument for assessing the Credibility of Effect Modification Analyses (ICEMAN). METHODS: To develop ICEMAN, we established a detailed concept; identified candidate credibility considerations in a systematic survey of the literature; together with experts, performed a consensus study to identify key considerations and develop them into instrument items; and refined the instrument based on feedback from trial investigators, systematic review authors and journal editors, who applied drafts of ICEMAN to published claims of effect modification. RESULTS: The final instrument consists of a set of preliminary considerations, core questions (5 for RCTs, 8 for meta-analyses) with 4 response options, 1 optional item for additional considerations and a rating of credibility on a visual analogue scale ranging from very low to high. An accompanying manual provides rationales, detailed instructions and examples from the literature. Seventeen potential users tested ICEMAN; their suggestions improved the user-friendliness of the instrument. INTERPRETATION: The Instrument for assessing the Credibility of Effect Modification Analyses offers explicit guidance for investigators, systematic reviewers, journal editors and others considering making a claim of effect modification or interpreting a claim made by others.<br />Investigators who conduct randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and meta-analyses of RCTs often perform analyses of effect modification to assess whether intervention effects might vary by another variable such as age, [...]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
08203946
Volume :
192
Issue :
32
Database :
Gale General OneFile
Journal :
CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal
Publication Type :
Periodical
Accession number :
edsgcl.632774784
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.200077