A trade-off between plant and soil carbon storage under elevated CO.sub.2

Terrestrial ecosystems remove about 30 per cent of the carbon dioxide (CO.sub.2) emitted by human activities each year.sup.1, yet the persistence of this carbon sink depends partly on how plant biomass and soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks respond to future increases in atmospheric CO.sub.2 (refs. .sup.2,3). Although plant biomass often increases in elevated CO.sub.2 (eCO.sub.2) experiments.sup.4-6, SOC has been observed to increase, remain unchanged or even decline.sup.7. The mechanisms that drive this variation across experiments remain poorly understood, creating uncertainty in climate projections.sup.8,9. Here we synthesized data from 108 eCO.sub.2 experiments and found that the effect of eCO.sub.2 on SOC stocks is best explained by a negative relationship with plant biomass: when plant biomass is strongly stimulated by eCO.sub.2, SOC storage declines; conversely, when biomass is weakly stimulated, SOC storage increases. This trade-off appears to be related to plant nutrient acquisition, in which plants increase their biomass by mining the soil for nutrients, which decreases SOC storage. We found that, overall, SOC stocks increase with eCO.sub.2 in grasslands (8 [plus or minus] 2 per cent) but not in forests (0 [plus or minus] 2 per cent), even though plant biomass in grasslands increase less (9 [plus or minus] 3 per cent) than in forests (23 [plus or minus] 2 per cent). Ecosystem models do not reproduce this trade-off, which implies that projections of SOC may need to be revised. A synthesis of elevated carbon dioxide experiments reveals that when plant biomass is strongly stimulated by elevated carbon dioxide levels, soil carbon storage declines, and where biomass is weakly stimulated, soil carbon accumulates.
Author(s): C. Terrer [sup.1] [sup.2] , R. P. Phillips [sup.3] , B. A. Hungate [sup.4] [sup.5] , J. Rosende [sup.6] , J. Pett-Ridge [sup.1] , M. E. Craig [sup.3] [sup.7] [...]