Back to Search Start Over

'It Can't Hurt!': Why Many Patients With Limited Life Expectancy Decide to Accept Lung Cancer Screening

Authors :
Nunez, Eduardo R.
Bolton, Rendelle E.
Boudreau, Jacqueline H.
Sliwinski, Samantha K.
Herbst, Abigail N.
Kearney, Lauren E.
Caverly, Tanner J.
Wiener, Renda Soylemez
Source :
Annals of Family Medicine. March-April, 2024, Vol. 22 Issue 2, p95, 8 p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

PURPOSE Lung cancer screening (LCS) has less benefit and greater potential for iatrogenic harm among people with multiple comorbidities and limited life expectancy. Yet, such individuals are more likely to undergo screening than healthier LCS-eligible people. We sought to understand how patients with marginal LCS benefit conceptualize their health and make decisions regarding LCS. METHODS We interviewed 40 people with multimorbidity and limited life expectancy, as determined by high Care Assessment Need scores, which predict 1-year risk of hospitalization or death. Patients were recruited from 6 Veterans Health Administration facilities after discussing LCS with their clinician. We conducted a thematic analysis using constant comparison to explore factors that influence LCS decision making. RESULTS Patients commonly held positive beliefs about screening and perceived LCS to be noninvasive. When posed with hypothetical scenarios of limited benefit, patients emphasized the nonlongevity benefits of LCS (eg, peace of mind, planning for the future) and generally did not consider their health status or life expectancy when making decisions regarding LCS. Most patients were unaware of possible additional evaluations or treatment of screen-detected findings, but when probed further, many expressed concerns about the potential need for multiple evaluations, referrals, or invasive procedures. CONCLUSIONS Patients in this study with multimorbidity and limited life expectancy were unaware of their greater risk of potential harm when accepting LCS. Given patient trust in clinician recommendations, it is important that clinicians engage patients with marginal LCS benefit in shared decision making, ensuring that their values of desiring more information about their health are weighed against potential harms from further evaluations. Key words: lung cancer; lung cancer screening; qualitative methods: key informant/depth interviewing; cancer: screening; chronic care: comorbidity/multimorbidity; primary care issues: patient-centered care<br />INTRODUCTION Achieving mortality reduction with lung cancer screening (LCS) (1,2) while minimizing iatrogenic harm requires optimizing patient selection: screening people likely to benefit from early detection and not screening those [...]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
15441709
Volume :
22
Issue :
2
Database :
Gale General OneFile
Journal :
Annals of Family Medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsgcl.790513490
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.3081