Back to Search Start Over

Efficacy of rofecoxib, celecoxib, and acetaminophen in osteoarthritis of the knee: A randomized trial. (Original Contribution)

Authors :
Geba, Gregory P.
Weaver, Arthur L.
Polis, Adam B.
Dixon, Mary E.
Schnitzer, Thomas J.
Source :
JAMA, The Journal of the American Medical Association. Jan 2, 2002, Vol. 287 Issue 1, p64, 8 p.
Publication Year :
2002

Abstract

The COX-2 inhibitor rofecoxib at a dosage of 25 milligrams per day appears to be more effective than celecoxib or acetaminophen for treating osteoarthritis in the knee. This was the conclusion of a study of 382 patients.<br />Context: Osteoarthritis (OA) is often treated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), acetaminophen, or specific inhibitors of cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2). Objective: To assess the relative therapeutic efficacy of rofecoxib, celecoxib, and acetaminophen in adults with OA. Design and Setting: Randomized, parallel-group, double-blind trial, conducted from June 1999 to February 2000, in 29 clinical centers in the United States. Patients: Three hundred eighty-two patients aged at least 40 years who had OA of the knee that was previously treated with NSAIDs or acetaminophen. Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned to receive rofecoxib, 12.5 mg/d (n = 96); rofecoxib, 25 mg/d (n = 95); celecoxib, 200 mg/d (n = 97); or acetaminophen, 4000 mg/d (n = 94) for 6 weeks. Main Outcome Measures: Assessments over days 1 to 6 and over 6 weeks included pain on walking, night pain, pain at rest, and morning stiffness as measured on a Western Ontario McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (100-mm visual analog scale [VAS]) and global response to therapy compared among 4 treatment groups. Results: 79% of patients completed the study. More patients treated with acetaminophen discontinued early due to lack of efficacy than patients treated with COX-2 inhibitors (31% vs 18%-19%). Efficacy assessed in the first 6 days of therapy showed greatest response to rofecoxib, 25 mg/d, followed by rofecoxib, 12.5 mg/d, celecoxib, and acetaminophen, respectively, in terms of relief of pain on walking (-32.2, -29.0, -26.4, and -20.6 mm change on the VAS; P[less than or equal to].04 for all others vs acetaminophen; P =.05 for 25-mg rofecoxib vs celecoxib), rest pain (-21.8, -18.6, -15.5, and -12.5 mm; P[less than or equal to].02 for either dose of rofecoxib vs acetaminophen and P = .02 for rofecoxib, 25 mg/d, vs celecoxib), night pain (-25.2, -22.0, -18.7, and -18.8 mm; P = .04 for rofercoxib, 25 mg/d, vs both acetaminophen and celecoxib), and morning stiffness (-30.4, -28.4, -25.7, and -20.9 mm; P[less than or equal to].02 for either dose of rofecoxib vs acetaminophen). Over 6 weeks, rofecoxib, 25 mg/d, provid ed greatest response for night pain (P Conclusion: Rofecoxib, 25 mg/d, provided efficacy advantages over acetarninophen, 4000 mg/d, celecoxib, 200 mg/d, and rofecoxib, 12.5 mg, for symptomatic knee OA.

Details

ISSN :
00987484
Volume :
287
Issue :
1
Database :
Gale General OneFile
Journal :
JAMA, The Journal of the American Medical Association
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsgcl.81566352