Back to Search Start Over

Comparison of nasal and face mask ventilation in anaesthetised obese adults: A randomised controlled study

Authors :
Singh, Gyan
Luthra, Neeru
Jain, Richa
Grewal, Anju
Garg, Shubham
Mann, Livleen Deep
Source :
Indian Journal of Anaesthesia. March 1, 2024, Vol. 68 Issue 3, p267, 6 p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background and Aims: The use of a face mask while inducing general anaesthesia (GA) in obese patients is often ineffective in providing adequate ventilation. Although nasal mask ventilation has demonstrated effectiveness for continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in obese patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA), it has not yet been applied to the induction of anaesthesia. This study evaluated the efficacy of nasal mask ventilation against standard face mask ventilation in anaesthetised obese patients with body mass index (BMI)>25 kg/m[sup.2]. Methods: Ninety adult patients with BMI >25 kg/m[sup.2] were randomly assigned to receive either facemask (Group FM) or nasal-mask (Group NM) ventilation during induction of GA. Expired tidal volume (Vt[sub.E]), air leak, peak inspiratory pressure (PIP), plateau pressure (P[sub.PLAT]), oxygen saturation (SpO[sub.2]), and end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO[sub.2]) were recorded for10 breaths, and their mean was analysed. Results: The mean (standard deviation) Vt[sub.E] measured was not significantly higher in Group NM [455.98 (55.64) versus 436.90 (49.50) mL, P = 0.08, degree of freedom (df):88, mean difference (95% confidence interval [CI]) -19.08 (-41.14, 2.98) mL]. Mean air-leak [16.44 (22.16) versus 31.63 (21.56) mL, P = 0.001, df: 88, mean difference 95%CI: 15.19 (6.03,24.35)], mean PIP [14.79 (1.39) versus 19.94 (3.05) cmH[sub.2]O, P = 0.001, df: 88, mean difference, 95%CI: 5.15 (4.16, 6.14)], and mean P[sub.PLAT] [12.04 (1.21) versus 16.66 (2.56) cmH[sub.2]O, P = 0.001, df: 88, mean difference 95% CI: 4.62 (3.78, 5.45)] were significantly lower in Group NM. EtCO[sub.2,] SpO[sub.2], and haemodynamic measurements were similar between the two groups. Conclusion: Nasal mask ventilation is an effective ventilation method and can be used as an alternative to face mask ventilation in anaesthetised obese adults with BMI>25 kg/m[sup.2]. Keywords: Body mass index, face mask, general anaesthesia, nasal, obese, tidal volume, ventilation<br />Author(s): Gyan Singh [1]; Neeru Luthra [1]; Richa Jain (corresponding author) [1]; Anju Grewal [2]; Shubham Garg [1]; Livleen Deep Mann [1] INTRODUCTION Mask ventilation is pivotal in the initial [...]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00195049
Volume :
68
Issue :
3
Database :
Gale General OneFile
Journal :
Indian Journal of Anaesthesia
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsgcl.817933763
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_404_23