Back to Search Start Over

Performance of diagnostic mammography for women with signs or symptoms of breast cancer

Authors :
Barlow, William E.
Lehman, Constance D.
Zheng, Yingye
Ballard-Barbash, Rachel
Yankaskas, Bonnie C.
Cutter, Gary R.
Carney, Patricia A.
Geller, Berta M.
Rosenberg, Robert
Kerlikowske, Karla
Weaver, Donald L.
Taplin, Stephen H.
Source :
Journal of the National Cancer Institute. August 7, 2002, Vol. 94 Issue 15, p1151, 9 p.
Publication Year :
2002

Abstract

Background: The performance of diagnostic mammography for women with signs or symptoms of breast cancer has not been well studied. We evaluated whether age, breast density, self-reported breast lump, and previous mammography influence the performance of diagnostic mammography. Methods: From January 1996 through March 1998, prospective diagnostic mammography data from women aged 25-89 years with no previous breast cancer were linked to cancer outcomes data in six mammography registries participating in the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium. We used the final mammographic assessment at the end of the imaging work-up to determine abnormal mammographic examination rate, positive predictive value (PPV), sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. We used age, breast density, prior mammogram, and self-reported breast lump jointly as predictors of performance. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: Of 41427 diagnostic mammograms, 6279 (15.2%) were judged abnormal. The overall PPV was 21.8%, sensitivity was 85.8%, and specificity was 87.7%. Multivariate analysis showed that sensitivity and specificity generally declined as breast density increased (P = .007 and P

Details

ISSN :
00278874
Volume :
94
Issue :
15
Database :
Gale General OneFile
Journal :
Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Publication Type :
Periodical
Accession number :
edsgcl.90835527