Back to Search Start Over

Aerosol and Cloud Interaction Observed From High Spectral Resolution Lidar Data

Authors :
Su, Wenying
Schuster, Gregory L
Loeb, Norman G
Rogers, Raymond R
Ferrare, Richard A
Hostetler, Chris A
Hair, Johnathan W
Obland, Michael D
Source :
Journal of Geophysical Research. 113
Publication Year :
2008
Publisher :
United States: NASA Center for Aerospace Information (CASI), 2008.

Abstract

Recent studies utilizing satellite retrievals have shown a strong correlation between aerosol optical depth (AOD) and cloud cover. However, these retrievals from passive sensors are subject to many limitations, including cloud adjacency (or 3D) effects, possible cloud contamination, uncertainty in the AOD retrieval. Some of these limitations do not exist in High Spectral Resolution Lidar (HSRL) observations; for instance, HSRL observations are not a ected by cloud adjacency effects, are less prone to cloud contamination, and offer accurate aerosol property measurements (backscatter coefficient, extinction coefficient, lidar ratio, backscatter Angstrom exponent,and aerosol optical depth) at a neospatial resolution (less than 100 m) in the vicinity of clouds. Hence, the HSRL provides an important dataset for studying aerosol and cloud interaction. In this study, we statistically analyze aircraft-based HSRL profiles according to their distance from the nearest cloud, assuring that all profile comparisons are subject to the same large-scale meteorological conditions. Our results indicate that AODs from HSRL are about 17% higher in the proximity of clouds (approximately 100 m) than far away from clouds (4.5 km), which is much smaller than the reported cloud 3D effect on AOD retrievals. The backscatter and extinction coefficients also systematically increase in the vicinity of clouds, which can be explained by aerosol swelling in the high relative humidity (RH) environment and/or aerosol growth through in cloud processing (albeit not conclusively). On the other hand, we do not observe a systematic trend in lidar ratio; we hypothesize that this is caused by the opposite effects of aerosol swelling and aerosol in-cloud processing on the lidar ratio. Finally, the observed backscatter Angstrom exponent (BAE) does not show a consistent trend because of the complicated relationship between BAE and RH. We demonstrate that BAE should not be used as a surrogate for Angstrom exponent, especially at high RH.

Subjects

Subjects :
Meteorology And Climatology

Details

Language :
English
Volume :
113
Database :
NASA Technical Reports
Journal :
Journal of Geophysical Research
Notes :
WBS: 921266.04.07.07
Publication Type :
Report
Accession number :
edsnas.20090026563
Document Type :
Report
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010588