Back to Search Start Over

Uncertainties in the Modelled CO2 Threshold for Antarctic Glaciation

Authors :
Gasson, E
Lunt, D. J
DeConto, R
Goldner, A
Heinemann, M
Huber, M
LeGrande, A. N
Pollard, D
Sagoo, N
Siddall, M
Winguth, A
Valdes, P. J
Source :
Climate of the Past. 10(2)
Publication Year :
2014
Publisher :
United States: NASA Center for Aerospace Information (CASI), 2014.

Abstract

frequently cited atmospheric CO2 threshold for the onset of Antarctic glaciation of approximately780 parts per million by volume is based on the study of DeConto and Pollard (2003) using an ice sheet model and the GENESIS climate model. Proxy records suggest that atmospheric CO2 concentrations passed through this threshold across the Eocene-Oligocene transition approximately 34 million years. However, atmospheric CO2 concentrations may have been close to this threshold earlier than this transition, which is used by some to suggest the possibility of Antarctic ice sheets during the Eocene. Here we investigate the climate model dependency of the threshold for Antarctic glaciation by performing offline ice sheet model simulations using the climate from 7 different climate models with Eocene boundary conditions (HadCM3L, CCSM3, CESM1.0, GENESIS, FAMOUS, ECHAM5 and GISS_ER). These climate simulations are sourced from a number of independent studies, and as such the boundary conditions, which are poorly constrained during the Eocene, are not identical between simulations. The results of this study suggest that the atmospheric CO2 threshold for Antarctic glaciation is highly dependent on the climate model used and the climate model configuration. A large discrepancy between the climate model and ice sheet model grids for some simulations leads to a strong sensitivity to the lapse rate parameter.

Subjects

Subjects :
Meteorology And Climatology

Details

Language :
English
Volume :
10
Issue :
2
Database :
NASA Technical Reports
Journal :
Climate of the Past
Notes :
WBS 509496.02.08.04.24
Publication Type :
Report
Accession number :
edsnas.20140017657
Document Type :
Report
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-10-451-2014