Back to Search Start Over

First-cycle rash and survival in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer receiving cetuximab in combination with first-line chemotherapy: a subgroup analysis of data from the FLEX phase 3 study

Authors :
Gatzemeier, Ulrich
von Pawel, J
Vynnychenko, Ihor
Zatloukal, Petr
De Marinis, Filippo
Eberhardt, Wilfried
Paz-Ares, Luis
Schumacher, Karl-Maria
Goddemeier, Thomas
O'Byrne, Kenneth
Pirker, Robert
Gatzemeier, Ulrich
von Pawel, J
Vynnychenko, Ihor
Zatloukal, Petr
De Marinis, Filippo
Eberhardt, Wilfried
Paz-Ares, Luis
Schumacher, Karl-Maria
Goddemeier, Thomas
O'Byrne, Kenneth
Pirker, Robert
Source :
The Lancet Oncology
Publication Year :
2011

Abstract

Background: The randomised phase 3 First-Line Erbitux in Lung Cancer (FLEX) study showed that the addition of cetuximab to cisplatin and vinorelbine significantly improved overall survival compared with chemotherapy alone in the first-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The main cetuximab-related side-effect was acne-like rash. Here, we assessed the association of this acne-like rash with clinical benefit. Methods: We did a subgroup analysis of patients in the FLEX study, which enrolled patients with advanced NSCLC whose tumours expressed epidermal growth factor receptor. Our landmark analysis assessed if the development of acne-like rash in the first 21 days of treatment (first-cycle rash) was associated with clinical outcome, on the basis of patients in the intention-to-treat population alive on day 21. The FLEX study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00148798. Findings: 518 patients in the chemotherapy plus cetuximab group-290 of whom had first-cycle rash-and 540 patients in the chemotherapy alone group were alive on day 21. Patients in the chemotherapy plus cetuximab group with first-cycle rash had significantly prolonged overall survival compared with patients in the same treatment group without first-cycle rash (median 15·0 months [95% CI 12·8-16·4] vs 8·8 months [7·6-11·1]; hazard ratio [HR] 0·631 [0·515-0·774]; p<0·0001). Corresponding significant associations were also noted for progression-free survival (median 5·4 months [5·2-5·7] vs 4·3 months [4·1-5·3]; HR 0·741 [0·607-0·905]; p=0·0031) and response (rate 44·8% [39·0-50·8] vs 32·0% [26·0-38·5]; odds ratio 1·703 [1·186-2·448]; p=0·0039). Overall survival for patients without first-cycle rash was similar to that of patients that received chemotherapy alone (median 8·8 months [7·6-11·1] vs 10·3 months [9·6-11·3]; HR 1·085 [0·910-1·293]; p=0·36). The significant overall survival benefit for patients with first-cycle rash versus without was seen in all histology subg

Details

Database :
OAIster
Journal :
The Lancet Oncology
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.ocn864712084
Document Type :
Electronic Resource