Back to Search Start Over

The Relationship between Plantar Fasciitis and Plantar Heel Pressure

Authors :
Bartolo, Erica
Formosa, Cynthia
Gatt, Alfred
Bartolo, Erica
Formosa, Cynthia
Gatt, Alfred

Abstract

[Abstract] Objective: The presence of increased medial heel plantar pressure in plantar fasciitis has been debated, with clinicians often utilizing pressure-relieving devices, such as heel pads and cups, as a means of management.Method: Plantar pressures in a sample of 15 adult participants with chronic plantar fasciitis were compared to plantar pressures of the 15 adult participants forming the control group, who were matched for age, gender and weight.Results: There were no significant differences in peak heel plantar pressure (p = 0.244), lateral peakplantar pressure (p = 0.876), forefoot peak plantar pressure (p = 0.576) and the Forefoot to Rearfoot peak pressure ratio (p = 0.242) between the 2 groups. However, there was a significant difference (p = 0.015) in medial heel peak plantar pressure between the 2 groups, with the plantar fasciitis group having lower medial heel pressure than the control group.Conclusion: The findings in this study suggest that there is no relationship between peak medial heel plantar pressures and chronic medio-plantar heel pain in plantar fascitis. There is also no shift in pressure from the symptomatic medio-plantar heel region to the latero-plantar heel and forefoot regions. As a result, pressure may not play a part in the pathophysiology of plantar fascitis.[Resumen] Objetivos: La presencia de incremento de presión plantar en la zona medial del talón en la fascitis plantar ha sido estudiado, y los clínicos a menudo utilizan dispositivos de alivio de la presión, como almohadillas de talón y cazoletas, como medio de manejo.Método: Las presiones plantares en una muestra de 15 participantes adultos con fascitis plantar crónica se compararon con las presiones plantares de los 15 participantes adultos que formaron el grupo control, que fueron comparados por edad, sexo y peso.Resultados: No hubo diferencias significativas en la presión plantar en el pico pico (p = 0,244), en la presión pico lateral (p = 0,876), en la presión plantar pico

Details

Database :
OAIster
Notes :
European Journal of Podiatry 2017, 3: 1-7 ISSN: 2445-1835, English
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1040692521
Document Type :
Electronic Resource