Back to Search Start Over

Treatment Course of Patients with Exudative Age-Related Macular Degeneration Using Ocular Hypotensives

Authors :
Modjtahedi,Bobeck S
Luong,Tiffany Q
Chiu,Stephan
van Zyl,Tavé
Lin,Jane C
Fong,Donald S
Modjtahedi,Bobeck S
Luong,Tiffany Q
Chiu,Stephan
van Zyl,Tavé
Lin,Jane C
Fong,Donald S
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Bobeck S Modjtahedi, 1–3 Tiffany Q Luong, 3 Stephan Chiu, 2 Tavé van Zyl, 4 Jane C Lin, 3 Donald S Fong 1–3 1Eye Monitoring Center, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Baldwin Park, CA, USA; 2Department of Ophthalmology, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Baldwin Park, CA, USA; 3Department of Research and Evaluation, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Pasadena, CA, USA; 4Glaucoma Service, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA, USACorrespondence: Bobeck S ModjtahediEye Monitoring Center, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, 1011 Baldwin Park Blvd, Baldwin Park, CA 91706, USAEmail BobModj@gmail.comPurpose: To characterize the visual outcomes and the treatment course of patients with exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD) based on ocular hypotensive use.Design: A matched retrospective cohort study of patients enrolled in Kaiser Permanente Southern California health plan was conducted. Patients taking ocular hypotensives were identified using pharmacy dispensing data and were matched to controls to compare visual acuity, number of anti-VEGF injections, and conversation to secondary anti-VEGF agents in the first year of treatment. Subgroup analysis was performed based on the number of ocular hypotensive agents (0, 1, 2 or 3+ agents) and drug class (aqueous suppressants and prostaglandin analogs).Results: A total of 234 patients patients were examined. Baseline and final visual acuity did not significantly differ between drop users and controls, including on subgroup analysis. The average number of anti-VEGF injections did not differ between drop users and controls (6.1 vs 6.2, p=0.97), nor did the percentage of patients who were switched to a second-line anti-VEGF agent (23.9% vs 17.9%, p=0.26). Subgroup analysis did not reveal significant differences in the number of anti-VEGF injections and the percentage of patients switched to secondary agents, with patients receiving 6 ± 1 injec

Details

Database :
OAIster
Notes :
text/html, English
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1141817546
Document Type :
Electronic Resource