Back to Search Start Over

Developing a Set of Core Outcomes for Trials in Hemodialysis: An International Delphi Survey

Authors :
Evangelidis, N
Tong, A
Manns, B
Hemmelgarn, B
Wheeler, DC
Tugwell, P
Crowe, S
Harris, T
Van Biesen, W
Winkelmayer, WC
Sautenet, B
O'Donoghue, D
Tam-Tham, H
Youssouf, S
Mandayam, S
Ju, A
Hawley, C
Pollock, C
Harris, DC
Johnson, DW
Rifkin, DE
Tentori, F
Agar, J
Polkinghorne, KR
Gallagher, M ; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9187-6187
Kerr, PG
McDonald, SP
Howard, K
Howell, M
Craig, JC
Evangelidis, N
Tong, A
Manns, B
Hemmelgarn, B
Wheeler, DC
Tugwell, P
Crowe, S
Harris, T
Van Biesen, W
Winkelmayer, WC
Sautenet, B
O'Donoghue, D
Tam-Tham, H
Youssouf, S
Mandayam, S
Ju, A
Hawley, C
Pollock, C
Harris, DC
Johnson, DW
Rifkin, DE
Tentori, F
Agar, J
Polkinghorne, KR
Gallagher, M ; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9187-6187
Kerr, PG
McDonald, SP
Howard, K
Howell, M
Craig, JC
Source :
urn:ISSN:0272-6386; urn:ISSN:1523-6838; American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 70, 4, 464-475
Publication Year :
2017

Abstract

Background Survival and quality of life for patients on hemodialysis therapy remain poor despite substantial research efforts. Existing trials often report surrogate outcomes that may not be relevant to patients and clinicians. The aim of this project was to generate a consensus-based prioritized list of core outcomes for trials in hemodialysis. Study Design In a Delphi survey, participants rated the importance of outcomes using a 9-point Likert scale in round 1 and then re-rated outcomes in rounds 2 and 3 after reviewing other respondents’ scores. For each outcome, the median, mean, and proportion rating as 7 to 9 (critically important) were calculated. Setting & Participants 1,181 participants (202 [17%] patients/caregivers, 979 health professionals) from 73 countries completed round 1, with 838 (71%) completing round 3. Outcomes & Measurements Outcomes included in the potential core outcome set met the following criteria for both patients/caregivers and health professionals: median score ≥ 8, mean score ≥ 7.5, proportion rating the outcome as critically important ≥ 75%, and median score in the forced ranking question < 10. Results Patients/caregivers rated 4 outcomes higher than health professionals: ability to travel, dialysis-free time, dialysis adequacy, and washed out after dialysis (mean differences of 0.9, 0.5, 0.3, and 0.2, respectively). Health professionals gave a higher rating for mortality, hospitalization, decrease in blood pressure, vascular access complications, depression, cardiovascular disease, target weight, infection, and potassium (mean differences of 1.0, 1.0, 1.0, 0.9, 0.9, 0.8, 0.7, 0.4, and 0.4, respectively). Limitations The Delphi survey was conducted online in English and excludes participants without access to a computer and internet connection. Conclusions Patients/caregivers gave higher priority to lifestyle-related outcomes than health professionals. The prioritized outcomes for both groups were vascular access problems, dialysis ad

Details

Database :
OAIster
Journal :
urn:ISSN:0272-6386; urn:ISSN:1523-6838; American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 70, 4, 464-475
Notes :
application/pdf
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1150054457
Document Type :
Electronic Resource