Back to Search Start Over

An Agenda for Open Science in Communication

Authors :
Dienlin, Tobias
Johannes, Niklas
Bowman, Nicholas David
Masur, Philipp K.
Engesser, Sven
Kümpel, Anna Sophie
Lukito, Josephine
Bier, Lindsey M.
Zhang, Renwen
Johnson, Benjamin K.
Huskey, Richard
Schneider, Frank M.
Breuer, Johannes
Parry, Douglas A.
Vermeulen, Ivar
Fisher, Jacob T.
Banks, Jaime
Weber, René
Ellis, David A.
Smits, Tim
Ivory, James Dee
Trepte, Sabine
McEwan, Bree
Rinke, Eike Mark
Neubaum, German
Winter, Stephan
Carpenter, Christopher J.
Krämer, Nicole
Utz, Sonja
Unkel, Julian
Wang, Xiaohui
Davidson, Brittany I.
Kim, Nuri
Won, Andrea Stevenson
Domahidi, Emese
Lewis, Neil A.
de Vreese, Claes
Dienlin, Tobias
Johannes, Niklas
Bowman, Nicholas David
Masur, Philipp K.
Engesser, Sven
Kümpel, Anna Sophie
Lukito, Josephine
Bier, Lindsey M.
Zhang, Renwen
Johnson, Benjamin K.
Huskey, Richard
Schneider, Frank M.
Breuer, Johannes
Parry, Douglas A.
Vermeulen, Ivar
Fisher, Jacob T.
Banks, Jaime
Weber, René
Ellis, David A.
Smits, Tim
Ivory, James Dee
Trepte, Sabine
McEwan, Bree
Rinke, Eike Mark
Neubaum, German
Winter, Stephan
Carpenter, Christopher J.
Krämer, Nicole
Utz, Sonja
Unkel, Julian
Wang, Xiaohui
Davidson, Brittany I.
Kim, Nuri
Won, Andrea Stevenson
Domahidi, Emese
Lewis, Neil A.
de Vreese, Claes
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

In the last 10 years, many canonical findings in the social sciences appear unreliable. This so-called “replication crisis” has spurred calls for open science practices, which aim to increase the reproducibility, replicability, and generalizability of findings. Communication research is subject to many of the same challenges that have caused low replicability in other fields. As a result, we propose an agenda for adopting open science practices in Communication, which includes the following seven suggestions: (1) publish materials, data, and code; (2) preregister studies and submit registered reports; (3) conduct replications; (4) collaborate; (5) foster open science skills; (6) implement Transparency and Openness Promotion Guidelines; and (7) incentivize open science practices. Although in our agenda we focus mostly on quantitative research, we also reflect on open science practices relevant to qualitative research. We conclude by discussing potential objections and concerns associated with open science practices.

Details

Database :
OAIster
Notes :
en_US
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1199336479
Document Type :
Electronic Resource