Back to Search Start Over

A brief, patient- and proxy-reported outcome measure in advanced illness: Validity, reliability and responsiveness of the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS)

Authors :
Murtagh, Fliss E. M.
Ramsenthaler, Christina
Firth, Alice
Groeneveld, Esther I.
Lovell, Natasha
Simon, Steffen T.
Denzel, Johannes
Guo, Ping
Bernhardt, Florian
Schildmann, Eva
van Oorschot, Birgitt
Hodiamont, Farina
Streitwieser, Sabine
Higginson, Irene J.
Bausewein, Claudia
Murtagh, Fliss E. M.
Ramsenthaler, Christina
Firth, Alice
Groeneveld, Esther I.
Lovell, Natasha
Simon, Steffen T.
Denzel, Johannes
Guo, Ping
Bernhardt, Florian
Schildmann, Eva
van Oorschot, Birgitt
Hodiamont, Farina
Streitwieser, Sabine
Higginson, Irene J.
Bausewein, Claudia
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Background: Few measures capture the complex symptoms and concerns of those receiving palliative care. Aim: To validate the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale, a measure underpinned by extensive psychometric development, by evaluating its validity, reliability and responsiveness to change. Design: Concurrent, cross-cultural validation study of the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale - both (1) patient self-report and (2) staff proxy-report versions. We tested construct validity (factor analysis, known-group comparisons, and correlational analysis), reliability (internal consistency, agreement, and test-retest reliability), and responsiveness (through longitudinal evaluation of change). Setting/participants: In all, 376 adults receiving palliative care, and 161 clinicians, from a range of settings in the United Kingdom and Germany Results: We confirm a three-factor structure (Physical Symptoms, Emotional Symptoms and Communication/Practical Issues). Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale shows strong ability to distinguish between clinically relevant groups; total Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale and Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale subscale scores were higher - reflecting more problems - in those patients with 'unstable' or 'deteriorating' versus 'stable' Phase of Illness (F = 15.1, p < 0.001). Good convergent and discriminant validity to hypothesised items and subscales of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General is demonstrated. The Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale shows good internal consistency (alpha = 0.77) and acceptable to good test-retest reliability (60% of items k(w) > 0.60). Longitudinal validity in form of responsiveness to change is good. Conclusion: The Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale is a valid and reliable outcome measure, both in patient self-report and staff proxy-report versions. It can assess and monitor symptoms and concerns in advanced illness, dete

Details

Database :
OAIster
Notes :
English
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1201314800
Document Type :
Electronic Resource