Back to Search Start Over

Improved survival in myeloma patients : starting to close in on the gap between elderly patients and a matched normal population

Authors :
Liwing, Johan
Uttervall, Katarina
Lund, Johan
Aldrin, Anders
Blimark, Cecilie
Carlson, Kristina
Enestig, Jon
Flogegård, Max
Forsberg, Karin
Gruber, Astrid
Kviele, Helene Haglöf
Johansson, Peter
Lauri, Birgitta
Mellqvist, Ulf-Henrik
Swedin, Agneta
Svensson, Magnus
Näsman, Per
Alici, Evren
Gahrton, Gösta
Aschan, Johan
Nahi, Hareth
Liwing, Johan
Uttervall, Katarina
Lund, Johan
Aldrin, Anders
Blimark, Cecilie
Carlson, Kristina
Enestig, Jon
Flogegård, Max
Forsberg, Karin
Gruber, Astrid
Kviele, Helene Haglöf
Johansson, Peter
Lauri, Birgitta
Mellqvist, Ulf-Henrik
Swedin, Agneta
Svensson, Magnus
Näsman, Per
Alici, Evren
Gahrton, Gösta
Aschan, Johan
Nahi, Hareth
Publication Year :
2014

Abstract

The outcome for multiple myeloma patients has improved since the introduction of bortezomib, thalidomide and lenalidomide. However, studies comparing new and conventional treatment include selected patient groups. We investigated consecutive patients (n = 1638) diagnosed in a defined period and compared survival with a gender- and age-matched cohort Swedish population (n = 9 340 682). Median overall survival for non-high-dose treated patients was 2.8 years. The use of bortezomib, thalidomide or lenalidomide in first line therapy predicted a significantly longer overall survival (median 4.9 years) compared to conventional treatment (2.3 years). Among non-high-dose treated patients receiving at least 2 lines with bortezomib, thalidomide or lenalidomide, 69% and 63% have survived at 3 and 5 years as compared to 48% and 22% with conventional drugs and 88% and 79% in the matched cohort populations, respectively. The median overall survival in high-dose treated patients was 6.9 years. Of these patients, 84% survived at 3 years and 70% at 5 years as compared to 98% and 95% in the matched cohort population. Overall survival in the best non-high-dose treated outcome group is closing the gap with the matched cohort. Upfront use of new drugs is clearly better than waiting until later lines of treatment.

Details

Database :
OAIster
Notes :
English
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1233839473
Document Type :
Electronic Resource
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111.bjh.12685