Back to Search Start Over

International standards for programmes of training in intensive care medicine in Europe

Authors :
Bullock, A
Wilde, J D
Bion, J F
Clutton-Brock, T
Flaatten, H
Mathy, B
van Mook, W
Schuwirth, L
Marsh, B
Phelan, D
Shippey, B
Nimmo, G
Castel, S
Hillion, Y
Bonnet, J
Chaumont, D
Rothen, H U
Reay, H
Krenn, C
Germann, P
Ferdinande, P
de Backer, D
Smilov, I
Keremidchieva, N
Gasparoviae, V
Radonic, R
Kyprianou, T
Kakas, M
Sramek, V
Rubertsson, Sten
m.fl., (et al)
Bullock, A
Wilde, J D
Bion, J F
Clutton-Brock, T
Flaatten, H
Mathy, B
van Mook, W
Schuwirth, L
Marsh, B
Phelan, D
Shippey, B
Nimmo, G
Castel, S
Hillion, Y
Bonnet, J
Chaumont, D
Rothen, H U
Reay, H
Krenn, C
Germann, P
Ferdinande, P
de Backer, D
Smilov, I
Keremidchieva, N
Gasparoviae, V
Radonic, R
Kyprianou, T
Kakas, M
Sramek, V
Rubertsson, Sten
m.fl., (et al)
Publication Year :
2011

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop internationally harmonised standards for programmes of training in intensive care medicine (ICM). METHODS: Standards were developed by using consensus techniques. A nine-member nominal group of European intensive care experts developed a preliminary set of standards. These were revised and refined through a modified Delphi process involving 28 European national coordinators representing national training organisations using a combination of moderated discussion meetings, email, and a Web-based tool for determining the level of agreement with each proposed standard, and whether the standard could be achieved in the respondent's country. RESULTS: The nominal group developed an initial set of 52 possible standards which underwent four iterations to achieve maximal consensus. All national coordinators approved a final set of 29 standards in four domains: training centres, training programmes, selection of trainees, and trainers' profiles. Only three standards were considered immediately achievable by all countries, demonstrating a willingness to aspire to quality rather than merely setting a minimum level. Nine proposed standards which did not achieve full consensus were identified as potential candidates for future review. CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary set of clearly defined and agreed standards provides a transparent framework for assuring the quality of training programmes, and a foundation for international harmonisation and quality improvement of training in ICM.

Details

Database :
OAIster
Notes :
English
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1235076009
Document Type :
Electronic Resource
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007.s00134-010-2096-x