Back to Search Start Over

A randomised controlled trial of caseload midwifery care: M@NGO (Midwives @ New Group practice Options)

Authors :
Tracy, SK
Hartz, D
Hall, B
Allen, J
Forti, A
Lainchbury, A
White, J
Welsh, A ; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7389-0513
Tracy, MB
Kildea, S
Tracy, SK
Hartz, D
Hall, B
Allen, J
Forti, A
Lainchbury, A
White, J
Welsh, A ; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7389-0513
Tracy, MB
Kildea, S
Source :
urn:ISSN:1471-2393; BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 11, 1, 1-8
Publication Year :
2012

Abstract

Australia has an enviable record of safety for women in childbirth. There is nevertheless growing concern at the increasing level of intervention and consequent morbidity amongst childbearing women. Not only do interventions impact on the cost of services, they carry with them the potential for serious morbidities for mother and infant. Models of midwifery have proliferated in an attempt to offer women less fragmented hospital care. One of these models that is gaining widespread consumer, disciplinary and political support is caseload midwifery care. Caseload midwives manage the care of approximately 35-40 a year within a small Midwifery Group Practice (usually 4-6 midwives who plan their on call and leave within the Group Practice.) We propose to compare the outcomes and costs of caseload midwifery care compared to standard or routine hospital care through a randomised controlled trial.

Details

Database :
OAIster
Journal :
urn:ISSN:1471-2393; BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 11, 1, 1-8
Notes :
application/pdf
Publication Type :
Electronic Resource
Accession number :
edsoai.on1237253581
Document Type :
Electronic Resource